AUSTRALIA’S BUDGET NIGHT BINGO SPECIAL EDITION…!!
May 13, 2014
****SPECIAL LIVE BLOGGING BROADCAST EVENT!!****
With thanks to our benevolent benefactors, The Gutter Trash will be live blogging tonight’s Federal Budget Starring Smokin’ Joe Hockey LIVE from our luxuriously appointed studios at Parliament House.
The rules are simple – a three drink minimum commitment gets you in to the Gutter Trash Cigar Lounge where canapes and cocktails will flow as free as a Foreign Minister’s travel allowance and with all the grace and sophistication our stylish staff can afford.
And it appears the festivities are already well underway…
JOIN US LIVE TONIGHT FOR THIS EXCLUSIVE EVENT!
560 Comments
leave one →
Yeah, l better follow this post, l suspect, l too will have some bile l won`t be able to contain.
Where’s the bar?
Mate you tripped over it on the way in 🙂
https://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/a/23452289/mps-board-taxpayer-funded-flight/
+heavy lifting
+over used
+share the pain
(will be well used too)
I’m onto my second glass of red and have a election of fine cubans at the ready.
Well that’s one way to celebrate with a cuban, here’s another-
http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/06/29/us-cuba-reggaeton-idUSTRE55S6EK20090629
I’m still punting on a bullet train from Brisbane to Melbourne and Sydney to Parkes.
Sarah Ferguson introduces the Budge-it Speech.
What’s Julie Bishop done with her hair?
“Prosperity is not a gift!”
I’ve opened a 2006 bin 128, I don’t think it will last the distance.
Is that Julie Bishop on Joe’s left?
Kevin Andrews has done something to his hair too!
I’m in a hurry. I’m drinking vodka.
The budget is about the national interest (apparently)
THius budget is about the national interest..
*sip*
The age of entitlement is over!!
Hooray!!
Economic Action Strategy. Or EASY, in acronym-speak.
*Unfortunately Julie Bishop was unable to attend tonight so Margaret Pomeranz is sitting in her place*
Andrew Robb looks depressed.
“Margaret Pomeranz is sitting in her place”
Guffaw. *chug*
“abolishing …” this and that…
I think the budget should be presented in Friday nights, Tuesday is just too early in the week for red.
——
Everyone is making a contribution!!
**GLUG**
“We all must contribute”
Fetch me another glass…!
Warren Truss.
Clinically dead. *drink!*
“We should celebrate, celebrate!”
I am Joe “cheers”
I’m a little worried about Julie Bishop’s appearance. Who is her stylist? Julia Gillard??
Who’s the blond in the black outfit?
…and would she like a drink?
Joanna Lumley (aka Patsy Stone from Ab Fab) has kindly offered to sit in for Julie Bishop who was unavailable this evening..
If you turn your TV screen upside down you’ll actually see Julie Bishop “smile”
“When one person receives an entitlement, it comes out of the pocket of another Australian”
At least that stops Fifi from spending it.
**hic**
I have a complaint for the caterer. Why are you spoiling perfectly good Clix Crackers by putting these tiny black salty balls on them. You might as well be serving us fish eggs or something.
“Smack the dole bludgers”
I’ve never heard of that before!
Complaint noted ToSY….
“for Australians over 50…”
Who gives a F**K about them? Aren’t they dead yet?
“Madam Speaker for Australians over 50…”
Or like you, bordering on 100…
Envy of the world.
One you missed out Reb.
“values all levels of education””
…and charges accordingly!!
½ a bottle left.
Once in a generation reforms.
**GUZZLE**
Thank you Dianne! 🙂
Is Julie Bishop on some sort of methadone …?
The Socialist Alliance kids are clearing their throats.
Julie like this look, apparently.
http://www.mooncostumes.com/image/19359
l suspect JB is planning to `get some` after Joe`s blathering tonight
I think Shane Warne is in Julie’s chair tonight
“a historical commitment”
SWIG
Medical Research Future Fund, or MIDRIFF.
I saw Warren Truss blink – he’s not dead!!
Julie is getting more and more attractive.
Just leave the whole tray, thanks waiter.
‘reduce debt…”
That’s a surprise!!
Glug
$300 billion dollars!
#Eleventy
I miss Wayne. He
gave usannounced a surplus every year.there is a lot of empty seats in the `house`, did you lot notice
“Heavy lifting”
Drinking straight from the bottle….
“heavy lifting”
2nd bottle coming up.
“shovels will start moving”
Is that a good thing?
“shovels will start moving in a matter of months”
Who are these so-called “shovel movers” and why should we fear them…?
#empty seats
#watchingfromthememebersbar
#skol
Truss is doing a fine `zombie` impression tonight, he looks as bored as bat-shit
“They will lift living standards right across the nation”
#thingsshovelliftersdo
See how Joe used his hands to emphasise “lifting”
A PR guy taught him that, and I think it works really well.
Julie Bishop’s taken some acid
I noticed Teabag. Maybe those seats are always empty.
We are a nation of lifters not leaders..
WTF does that mean?
Nation of lifters, not leaners.
Who writes this stuff?
**chugalug**
“We’re a nation of lifters..”
Is that a compliment?
I took my glasses off, Julie had them steamed up.
Is that her now hosting 7.30?
The shovel budget, or SHOB.
Shop lifters?
“Shove it” budget.
l can`t find my shovel. Looks like l`m off the hook.
Coming Up – Smokin’ Joe on the 730 report…
I need to open another bottle…
Nation of lifters, not leaners,
#nolnol.
Is that 2% on the part above $180K or all of it?
that’s an outrage.
hi Dianne, it was opposition and independent seats,
they didn`t want to listen to Joe`s blather, can`t blame`em
(Clive has better things to do)
Fetch my smoking jacket. I’m breaking out the Habanas.
Did he mention “growing the pie?” I might’ve missed that….
I thought the whole thing was offensive and repugnant… #Justsayin
Is teabagz in charge of the controls? I’m going into spam, and that’s also a disgrace!
“growing the pie?”
The staples have popped, it looks like he’s eaten it.
Sorry ToM I don;t know what happened there..
Sarah Ferguson: “Troubled times ahead in the Sennit”
Who’s this Chris – “they could have chosen to keep their promises”
…and who would want that?
Re promises, Joe says – “you can play that game”
Ok, do we have some new rules for the game since Our Julia?
Nah yomm, l wouldn`t spam`ya even if l could, 🙂
JB`s copying Fergies look tonight, (so is sabra) so that JB can `distract` from Joe`s horrors, it seems to be working on yomm
“Heavy Lifting” WTF Is it…?
Heavy lifting with a shovel = hovel
What kind of pie? Apple. Beef and burgundy. chicken and Mushroooooms. Maybe Stargazy. They reminded me of sardines in blue ties poking out of suet pastry, blind eyes lifted to the heavens where Menzies resides.
We’re good at research!!
Along with heavy lifting!
Aussie, Aussie, Aussie!!
OI!OI!OI!
Heavy lifting is what all those staggering to pensionable age do.
I think Joe prefers lard pie Dianne.
Hahahah!
Hockey just admitted they have new taxes..!
good point on the GST by Ferguson, looks like this budget will also have most of the states at the teabags throats, yep, they`ve managed to piss-off `everybody`
I’m sorry, but we make no apologies for that.
Plenty of lard in Stargazy.
Joe has goven the papers their headline tomorrow. Did I mishear or did he just agree there are new taxes in the Budget?
Are those government charges and the increased bit they take out of my income really “taxes”?
Heavens!! How long has that been going on?
I didn’t mishear. Gosh. No cigars tonight.
Flexibildy, disabilidy, sustainabilidy.
#warontheletter”t”
Plenty of lard in Stargazy.”
Then that’s the pie Joe is talking about.
“Flexibildy, disabilidy, sustainabilidy.”
Did Our Julia write the speech?
Chris Bowen needs to find a safe seat and tell Shorten to f**k off.
Bowen has assumed the appropriate look of concern and outrage.
“Your health should not be determined by your wealth.”
(Nor by your physical fitness or abstinence, apparently.)
That’s it?
It should be like the Logies, were everyone goes to an after party.
I’m going to watch The Voice.
I just had to pop out to get another bottle..
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/budget-pain-not-for-millionaires-who-pay-no-tax-20140512-zr9o3.html
I’m thinking it really could be ‘one term tony’ 🙂
One column seems to be doing the heavy lifting.
Yeah, I always get my budget analysis from the Greens.
And Bernard Keane.
#onestopshovelshop
Crapper budgets? Crappier, perhaps?
#bernardwordz
hi dianne
yes, those cigar chomping fat cats are pretty heavy!
I’m on a late tomorrow, I think I’ll get a bottle now and hold a wake for the australia that we once knew and loved. That was a wet dream of a budget written by the IPA, Shepherd’s Business Council and all those massive, secret liberal party donors.
Crapper Budget.
Apparently the Opposition is going to do some prioritising.
Yes Armchair they have started to pull down the scaffolding which bore Fairish Go Oz aloft.
Yeah, I always get my budget analysis from the Greens.
I can see you’d rather have joe and his rich mates blowing cigar smoke up your arse.
”””””””””””””Yeah, I always get my budget analysis from the Greens. And Bernard Keane.””””’
l`m sure you will come back tomorrow with a full throated budget opinion after bolt and teh-ipa have told you what it is Tinfoil`osy
Hope they take a poll tonight or tomorrow, before the shysters and IPA spinners start lying – best not to even turn on the TV and radio for a few days.
Shit! A Hyundai hearse just pulled up outside … WTF! Already?
“I can see you’d rather have joe and his rich mates blowing cigar smoke up your arse.”
Feels nice. 😯
“best not to even turn on the TV and radio for a few days.”
Hide under the covers. Works for me.
I’m not sure whether I’m supposed to be lifting or digging.
#divisionoflabour
””””””””’The latest tax statistics show 75 ultra-high-earning Australians paid no tax at all in 2011-12. Zero. Zip.
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/budget-pain-not-for-millionaires-who-pay-no-tax-20140512-zr9o3.html
Each earned more than $1 million from investments or wages. Between them they made $195 million, an average of $2.6 million each.
The fortunate 75 paid no income tax, no Medicare levy and no Medicare surcharge, even though 60 of them had private health insurance.
The reason? They managed to cut their combined taxable incomes to $82. That’s right, $1.10 each.””””””””””’
lsn`t it wonderful that those that can extract the most from our country don`t end up contributing at all. #teabags
There go all those well cultivated howard battlers, running into the wide open arms of clive. You can count on clive being against that budget.
“When it came to investing they bought up big on shares that paid so-called franking credits on which they could claim tax deductions and stayed away from those that did not. They received $18.7 million in franked dividends in 2011-12, and only $565,000 in dividends that were unfranked.”
So-called Peter Martin/SMH.
I’m not happy with the idea that unemployed people under 30 have to wait 6 months before getting the dole. On face value it seems stupid and inhumane.
Highlights Of Hockey’s 2014 Budget:
https://newmatilda.com/2014/05/13/highlights-hockeys-2014-budget
…Business largely escaped the cost-cutting. A corporate tax cut of 1.5 per cent will flow to 8000 companies. There were no changes to big tax breaks for business and wealthy individuals, such as negative gearing, capital gains tax, and superannuation exemptions…
“Time for riots”
Yeah, right. Ya should occupy a shovel.
🙄
No bullet trains, pathetic.
”””””””””If Labor, Green and PUP have a big enough set of plums, this budget will never pass the senate… #Budget2014””””’
pups plum farm is ready to harvest #Go-Clive
(tho l do share Tinfoil`osy`s unsurprisement that the bastards will do all they can to be the bastards they are)
””””No bullet trains”””’
don`t worry dumpty, it`s in the `pipeline`, it is in the `cue` right behind the parramatta to epping rail bypass/link
””””””””””’I’m not happy with the idea that unemployed people under 30 have to wait 6 months before getting the dole. On face value it seems stupid and inhumane.””””””
that`s strange dumpty, you said ””good”” earlier, come to`ya senses briefly l see, have ya`worked out the false economy of it, that is likely to ensue
FMD even I’m personally affected. But Mrs Walrus is very happy.
My salary is to be cut to $179,099 by my accountant from the 1st of July but he’s increasing Mrs Walrus’ to $179,999
He’s a right proper Cnut !
(Well, that was an interesting budget.
Incidentally, el g, a ‘snowpiercer‘ might be more appropriate for the impending Little Ice Age.)
‘that`s strange dumpty, you said ””good”” earlier’
It was on the other fred, in relation to starting retirement age at 70.
‘He’s a right proper Cnut !’
I predict it will become a fashionable trend.
‘…the impending Little Ice Age.’
http://www.theverge.com/2014/1/28/5335822/snowpiercer-english-debut
Good catch Meta.
‘The Abbott government says the infrastructure package in Tuesday’s budget will “catalyse” up to $40bn in new investments – but its own specific contribution, depending on where you cut it, is in the order of only $5bn.’
Murphy / Guardian
Ah yes, I see it all so clearly now.
Do I hear the rumblings of a Double Dissolution?
Nah. Just Bill Shorten with fkn more piss and wind …
Egg, I agree re the 6 months wait – what if the poor bastards have a family to support …
Cruel, deceitful, cynical class warfare aimed at the weak, poor and defenceless of our society … the cuts/changes to welfare are permanent the increased taxes on those earning over $180k are temporary (as if $200 would bother them) … even the latter is unfair – they already pay the highest tax rate …
… not a bloody thing about any changes to pollies perqs and a benefit to business with a tax cut …
Sharing and caring my arse …
As for LIAR that’s the whole Lieberal Party … anywhere else in the world there would be people on the streets …
Won’t affect me much personally … but I feel for those people less well off and struggling …
How does removing support from people help them to get jobs … how does charging more for education, training and development help individuals and the nation improve …
Building a nation … my arse
And will all the “infrastructure” – roads be sold off as toll roads once WE have built them …
It’ll keep sacked miners off the street – for a little while …
Welcome to the thin edge of the wedge to the slippery slope to the USA …
The poor die off and the rich smoke cigars …
This budget is really about keeping the Robber Barons’ grist mills churning out profits, keeping the great unwashed controlled and the born to rule in power – the true destiny of the tories …
Go Clivey!
What he is Walrus is someone who thrives on conflict. He will be singing in the shower this morning because he was out last night tipping over rubbish bins.
He has delivered well for his masters.
Plenty more to come.
We are being dismantled.
‘I agree re the 6 months wait – what if the poor bastards have a family to support …’
Exactly. And what if someone has been sacked through no fault of their own, surely they deserve a safety net too.
‘And will all the “infrastructure” – roads be sold off as toll roads once WE have built them …’
Doubtful. The $5 billion for the road builds appears to be a sweetener, before the $40 billion flows in from China and the Emirates.
Road building will most likely be done by Australian workers, while the bullet trains to come later will probably be built by coolie labour.
You can watch Snowpiercer for free here:
http://putlocker.bz/watch-snowpiercer-online-free-putlocker.html
two and half stars.
‘You can watch Snowpiercer for free’
Thanx
—
GST will have to be increased.
Good News
The Mushroom Spawn Levy has been doubled
“”GST will have to be increased.””
I hope so
The best day of my life.
Oakes still the best and fairest …
Good find, sb, and yes “symbolism” is important …
I see the school chaplaincy program has been extended – probably using the money cut from CSIRO …
… religion over science is always a winner …
I hear a bloke is organising a convoy to Canberra and asking people to reword the last signs they used eg DITCH THE WITCH
The competition for new signs has the front runner as … PUNT THE C**T …
“”GST will have to be increased.””
I hope so
You really do want to boost the incomes of the funeral directors at the expense of the poor, fixed income defenceless people in our society, Wally …
The big difference between those that lean left and right – in a word – compassion … and another word – empathy …
‘I hope so’
Cleaver strategy by Abbott.
“”………..You really do want to boost the incomes of the funeral directors at the expense of the poor, fixed income defenceless people in our society,””
It’s PE Ratio is rather high at the moment but the rate of earnings growth is likely to be excellent
http://www.invocare.com.au
And another word: bullshit.
The adult daughter of a friend is a little slow. Her boyfriend has some type of mild compulsive disorder.
Both would be quite capable of working basic job – packing and labelling in a warehouse, looking after council gardens, giving food out in a hospital, weighing fruit and vegetables in a green grocer. But both seem to prefer the disability pension, which I presume they’ll take for another 45 years until they qualify for the old age pension.
Just coughing up 40 years of welfare for people in their mid 20s isn’t compassionate or showing empathy.
There seems to be a little slack in the system that should be tightened up.
And another word: bullshit.
You’re dead right, ToSY … Abbott and Hockey are certainly bullshit artists … like many of their supporters …
The more I read this “budget” the more I suspect it will actually damage the economy rather than help it – and thus society …
Ideologically driven, poorly conceived, badly planned and amateurishly executed (excuse the pun!)
Just coughing up 40 years of welfare for people in their mid 20s isn’t compassionate or showing empathy.There seems to be a little slack in the system that should be tightened up.
So tighten the system up … don’t destroy other people’s lives in a blanket fix just becaue of a minority …
BTW, once again you are playing the “expert” in health and medical issues … based upon one anecdotal scenario …
If the case is as you describe it screams out that we need more specialised workplaces (what used to be called sheltered workshops) and more specialised training and development programs …
So what has this budget provided in the way of creating more job opportunities? Lowering the business tax 1.5% … ???
Then what … axing PS jobs reducing funding the ABC/SBS … attacking uni and TAFE and schools …
And encouraging parents who want a paid six months off work to have a baby … *
Hockey and Abbott have set out to control ordinary people while giving business a free rein and insidiously inserting the Christian faith into the schools while withdrawing support for general education …
*sarc alert …
GST will have to be increased.
no, negative gearing and things like superannuation rorts and mining subsidies need to be ceased.
https://newmatilda.com/2014/05/14/hockeys-mean-budget-full-contradictions:
[John Quiggin] …If you want to get a feeling for the mess of contradictions, meanness, trickiness and tribalism that is the Abbott-Hockey Government’s first budget, it’s worth looking at two of the biggest decisions it contains.
The first is the massive cut of $7.5 billion to foreign aid, repudiating commitments made in Australia’s name by the previous government. The second is the proposal for a $20 billion fund for medical research, notionally financed out of co-payments made by sick people for visits to the doctor…
“”So what has this budget provided in the way of creating more job opportunities? “”
An $80B infrastructure program concentrating on developing greater productivity by diverting taxpayer funds from consumption spending (Family Tax Benefit A & B etc) to investment
And I don’t feel much sympathy for those PS bludgers at the ABC or SBS let alone the low life tax payer bludging scumbags from Canberra who sit around on their fat arses all day “”self studying”” to becoming 4th rate “Citizen Journos” who every second day need to issue half hearted apologies in between bouts on their mythical deathbed
❓
more from quiggin [in same article referenced above]
…Unfortunately for Abbott and Hockey, the public has grown tired of the kind of theatre exemplified by Commissions of Audit, horror budgets and so on. But, with nothing much better on offer from Labor and the Greens, they may well switch to the vaudeville of people like Clive Palmer…
no wonder the dickhead only ever has invite only meet & greets:
Budget is a moral failure…
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/14/this-budget-is-a-clear-victory-for-australias-1?CMP=twt_gu
Budget is a moral failure…
I think he is spot on with his analysis reb.
“”Budget is a moral failure…””
Coming from the Guardian……………………..what a surprise !
Coming from the Guardian……………………..what a surprise !
haha, coz murdoch’s media and shock jock radio is just so respected and unbiased 🙄
Budget 2014: Senate showdown looms after Clive Palmer’s ‘no back-down’ pledge on GP co-payments
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-14/clive-palmer-to-definitely-oppose-gp-co-payment/5451356
Moralising moralisers.
Who needs priests when you’ve got economists offering moral guidance?
Lefties are loving Clive because he’s thorn in Abbott’s side. Everything else about him is irrelevant.
Great news for those of you who wanted energy consumption/CO2 production curtailed.
Fantastic news for people like TB and Kitty et al………….
http://www.smh.com.au/business/energy-disconnections-on-the-rise-as-gas-prices-surge-20140513-387tn.html
“no wonder the dickhead only ever has invite only meet & greets:””
Vilma Vs. Tony Abbott
Pensioners are always really bitter, twisted and angry all the time.
Just look at TB for proof of that…………..!
“The truth is that, in this budget, the poor will make a permanent sacrifice, while the rich make only a temporary one. The 2 per cent tax levy on people earning over $180,000 expires after three years. The cuts to welfare and pensions will endure….”
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/federal-budget/the-populist-pm-is-gone-meet-abbott-the-ideologue-20140513-388d8.html#ixzz31ecby4H7
They get to keep their carbon tax over-compensation
Who needs priests when you’ve got economists offering moral guidance?
who needs priests anyway? [prefer our own to their immoral version of morals]
Lefties are loving Clive because he’s thorn in Abbott’s side. Everything else about him is irrelevant.
yeppers!
His personal mission to destroy the LNP is a win win for all.
Do I hear a rallying bugle call nearby for a new abbott/LNP slush fund to ‘get’ clive as they did over hanson? Oh silly me, they’ve already got the slush funds tucked away in all those secret fronts 😉
Meanwhile at ICAC:
‘So tighten the system up … don’t destroy other people’s lives in a blanket fix just becaue of a minority …’
There are 200,000 cannabis dependent individuals in Australia who can’t hold down a job. What to do?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/14/budget-2014-the-fallout-from-joe-hockeys-announcements-politics-live?CMP=twt_gu#block-5372ca77e4b09db46fef2e25
Q: Can I assume you have modelled the excise indexation of petrol, and specifically could I go to the ‘tax on a tax’ effect. Twice a year under your proposal, excise will go up and the GST will push the price up further on that. When will we reach $2 a litre for petrol – which would mean it would cost something like $140 to fill a family Camry?
Hockey:
Well, Malcolm, let me put it another way.
(Well yes, quite. For the record, Hockey declined to answer when petrol would hit $2 per litre courtesy of the GST and indexation.)
https://twitter.com/SymnWaters/status/466400617196683266
“………..Hockey declined to answer when petrol would hit $2 per litre courtesy of the GST and indexation.)””
Not to mention the Carbon Tax of course.
KL you should be rejoicing in these rises in power and fuel costs as they curtail CO2
Hockey has adopted a Green agenda for different reasons ( raising revenue).
The End justifies the Means afterall
“Hockey has adopted a Green agenda for different reasons (raising revenue).”
How is that a different agenda? The Carbon Tax could never affect global temperature. It was merely to raise revenue.
Oh alright then, maybe it also enabled a lot of wankers feel good about themselves.
KL you should be rejoicing in these rises in power and fuel costs as they curtail CO2
precisely how walrus? by socialised incentives for big business?
revenue raising paid by poor old pensioners shivering to death in their unheated homes because they can’t pay more in power bills? meanwhile big business/fossil fuel industry is not curtailed in any way, they are subsidised by those same poor folks to keep on polluting the air they breathe.
Aren’t the fossil fuel industry the ones providing the energy? At prices pensioners can afford? Maybe it is better to have very expensive energy only when the sun shines and the wind blows, but I can’t understand that logic.
And what will $71 trillion even mean to the few remaining people huddling in their caves? Has the Climate Council ever told the truth about anything? I think not. They are just rope-a-dope scare-mongers providing cover for climate profiteers.
I’m certainly not rich, but, in retirement, I plan never to darken the doorway of Centrelink. I’m paying the maximum concessional contributions into my super – currently $25,000 or $35,000, depending on your age – so I can be “self-funded”. Those amounts are the same whether you’re earning $50,000 or $10,000,000. This was Paul Keating’s plan: encourage people to provide for themselves and take pressure of the aged pension. Calling superannuation “tax concessions for the rich” is class warfare and the politics of envy.
Bernard Keane is a disgrace.
*pressure off
‘Calling superannuation “tax concessions for the rich” is class warfare and the politics of envy.’
It’s also wrong.
Tony, isn’t the issue that beyond a certain age you can have millions in the fund earning tax-free income and not pay tax on the distributions? Surely there is room for a means test so that ordinary tax is paid on the income and distributions beyond a certain level?
The concessions should only be what is necessary to ensure that people save a reasonable amount for retirement. Beyond that amount normal tax should apply.
The only way you’d get millions into super is by paying additional non-concessional contributions out of your after-tax income (on which you’ve already paid tax at your marginal rate). Tax-free distributions are only available in retirement, and the super fund has already paid tax on any profits. But isn’t that the point of super, to be an attractive alternative to the aged pension?
https://www.ato.gov.au/Individuals/Super/In-detail/Contributions/Super-contributions—too-much-super-can-mean-extra-tax/
“Calling superannuation “tax concessions for the rich” is class warfare and the politics of envy.”
I disagree…
Many working people cant afford to pay extra contributions into super, let alone pay their mortgage, so it definitely benefits those who can afford.
Secondly, as Snacty will attest, reducing an individual’s pre-taxable income by making additional contributions into super is a well-worn strategy of financial advisers in helping their clients pay little or no tax. As is, getting you to pay additional super contributions into your partner’s superannuation fund.
All perfectly legit and above board of course – for those who can afford to pay a financial adviser for the privilege, and for those who have the income to make those sorts of contributions.
So yes, it benefits the rich and those on middle to high incomes much more than it does someone earning $40,000 – $80,000 a year.
“The only way you’d get millions into super is by paying additional non-concessional contributions out of your after-tax income”
The other way is to make pre-tax contributions into your spouse’s super fund. Which is ideal for a couple where one member of the household is a high-income earner, and the other is a low-income earner, which sounds an awful lot like rich middle-class men and their wives who might work one hour a day at the kid’s tuck shop.
Coincidental I’m sure.
“So yes, it benefits the rich and those on middle to high incomes much more than it does someone earning $40,000 – $80,000 a year.”
Depends. If they have paid off their mortgage, educated and got rid of their kids, and are relatively debt-free, it’s conceivable that even someone on $40,000 might be able to put most of their income into super.
Just look at TB for proof of that…………..!
Someone once called me the oldest angry young man they knew, Wally …
My concern is for those worse off (and getting even worse off) than myself …
And I do fire up on issues of justice and equality …
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Oh silly me, they’ve already got the slush funds tucked away in all those secret fronts
Shouldn’t that be, “secret fonts”, KL?
===============================
I’m paying the maximum concessional contributions into my super – currently $25,000 or $35,000, depending on your age
… I’m very pleased for you, ToSY, and wish I had had that sort of opportunity … so would millions of other workers in fact …
Did you know you put into super what some people earn … and if you’re single, almost twice as much as a single pensioner lives on … and what a pensioner couple survive on …
Did I tell you that many BB PAID for a pension in taxes – till 1992 … did I tell you that the compulsory super scheme has only been around for 22 years … did I tell you that Keating’s plan was to reach 12% but the LibNits held it back for over a decade (had they not held back the pool would have doubled and the LibRips wouldn’t be ripping older people off)
Thank goodness we live in an egalitarian land of the fair go and looking after your mates …
“it’s conceivable that even someone on $40,000 might be able to put most of their income into super.”
Sure, it’s conceivable.
But is it likely.
Fuck no.
“Thank goodness we live in an egalitarian land of the fair go and looking after your mates …”
Droll TB, very droll…. 🙂
Tony if a retired individual has $10mil in a super fund and it earns $1m per year are you saying they should pay no tax at all?
At prices pensioners can afford?
That is a sarcastic comment I take it, sb …
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Depends. If they have paid off their mortgage, educated and got rid of their kids, and are relatively debt-free, it’s conceivable that even someone on $40,000 might be able to put most of their income into super.
it’s conceivable that even someone on $40,000 might be able to put most of their income into super.
paid off their mortgage, educated and got rid of their kids
Just how fkn old are you, ToSY?
You don’t seem to know much about owning a home (paid for or not), you don’t seem to know much about bringing up kids … particularly Gen Y kids …
Rates, power, water, maintenance, food, clothes, spring immediately to mind …
… as for “get rid of the kids!” LOL! LOL!
put most of their income into super
Most? Is that before tax or after tax?
Fk its hard work here sometimes …
Tony if a retired individual has $10mil in a super fund and it earns $1m per year are you saying they should pay no tax at all?
LOL! sb, even “droller” …
But isn’t that the point of super, to be an attractive alternative to the aged pension?
Yes, but the greedy millionaires want both! Ever heard of Robber Barons? Greedy pricks …
Click to access rt010-1307en.pdf
Page 28/29 on last link
Probably Splatter. If they’ve got $10,000,000 in super then most of the money they put in has already been taxed at (presumably, judging by the large amount) the highest marginal rate. They have chosen to invest their own money into super rather than somewhere else. So far, so good. Then the super fund pays 15% tax on those contributions. Should there be further marginal tax taken out before they receive their distributions? I’m not sure, but I’m inclined to think the rules should be the same for all.
Pretty sure you can get big licks in without the15% tax. That usually applies where a larger deduction has been available to the contributor either directly or because it is a pre-tax amount from the employer.
But my question is why can an individual’s super fund earn, say, $1m and pay no tax. That looks like a badly targeted concession at the very least.
“Most? Is that before tax or after tax?”
If you’d been paying attention, you’d know I could only be talking about Concessional Contributions, which are before tax. So if a person grossed $40,000, and the employer has paid the compulsory 9% contribution (now 9.25%) of $3,600, you could pay a maximum $21,400 into super. The maximum amount of tax you would pay on the remaining $18,600 is $76 – if you had no other deductions.
“Pretty sure you can get big licks in without the15% tax.”
Maybe. Where’s Walrus when you need him? 😉
You can put in $450k non-concessional (i.e. you don’t get a deduction and the fund pays no tax) every threee years. And then there is your partner’s fund.
But the point is not so much what you can put in, but that income above a certain amount should be subject to normal tax rates. So let’s be generous here and say that, in pension phase, the first $50k of income each year is tax free and the rest is taxed at the marginal rate. $50k tax free should provide a pretty good lifestyle don’t you think?
I’m not inclined to punish someone who has already paid tax on their income and decided to put it into super, especially by giving it to government to waste.
“concessional contributions above the concessional cap are taxed at 46.5%.”
https://www.ato.gov.au/Super/Self-managed-super-funds/Understanding-tax-and-SMSFs/
Kidsbegone*…
And in the end, if there is an audience for this Budget perhaps it is only elderly people who listened to right-wing talkback radio. Changes to the pension won’t come into effect until after the election (leaving plenty of time to be adjusted or smoothed over with other payments), changes to DSP affect only those under 35, and the major cuts target those with young families rather than ones who had kids decades ago.
*New definition(s) of kidult is <6/25/30/35.)
If a person invested $150,000 pa for three years in an interest bearing account, they’d pay their marginal tax rate on the interest and could withdraw the money whenever they liked, whether retired or not.
If that same person invested the same money in super, the super fund would pay tax on any intetest or dividends it earned (less franking credits and expenses), but they can’t access their money until retirement. Why should they then pay tax upon withdrawal?
If someone pays tax on their income and then invests it they pay tax on the invesment earnings. That is not “punishment”. However, if the investment is through a superfund in pension phase there is no tax no matter how much income is earned.
This is a tax concession. It should not be unlimited but rather applicable only up to a reasonable amount – say $50k of income. The objective of the super tax rules is not to provide tax free or highly concessional rates of tax to high incomes.
“if the investment is through a superfund in pension phase”
You can’t make investments into a pension account. You’d need to invest in a separate accumulation account, which would still pay tax.
If a person invested $150,000 pa …
Obviously some of us have never had bread and dripping for breakfast and asked if they could have some of the gravy!
Or lived off army rations for a couple of weeks …
How the cards of life do fall …
I was assuming the money was put in prior to that. I’m in my late 50s. I could put in quite a lot (if I had it) for my wife and me prior to pension phase.
The bottom line is that there is a ridiculous uncapped concession on superfund earnings in pension phase. It should be capped.
“”That looks like a badly targeted concession at the very least.””
Only if you are not the “bullseye””………………….LOL
I feel like the horse’s arse in all of this. Plenty of people out there earning large amounts of untaxed income while I try to scrape together a small super plan.
The bottom line is that there is a ridiculous uncapped concession on superfund earnings in pension phase. It should be capped.
By that I guess you mean the income test tightened – and I agree … …
Sorry for my absence. But someone had to grow a set amongst all the gnashing of teeth and collective wailing over what happened last night.
So I dusted myself off this morning after Joe’s attempted pillage of my finances and out into the cruel world I strolled……………….LOL
After all that I’m sure TB and KL have decided never to vote LNP ever…………ever…………again ……….LOL
Anyway keeping it simple the non concessional limits are $150K per annum or you can put in $450K in one hit via the 3 year roll forward provisions. But then you cant put anything in during the following 2 years………..get my drift
I just happen to have a client who has recently received an inheritance of > $1.1M and his wife is 1 year younger than he. They have access to their Super at 62 years and 63 years respectively so I’ve advised them to put in $150K before this 30 June coming up ( so there goes a total of $300K ) then on 1 July or anytime in the 2015 year they can put in $450K each (there goes $900K) by using the roll forward provisions.
Hey Presto…………………………………..$1.2M just disappeared into Super.
But don’t forget if there is a large age gap between partners you’ll end up with one being able to access but another perhaps having to wait years before they can access.
In their case they only need to wait a 2 years for her to access.
Thanks, Wally, (and you were MIA BTW) … but you just made the case for a total review of the rich being eligible for the pension … and the case for a review of the super concessions as, sb, has succinctly pointed out …
People with a million bucks do not need the pension … unless they are pretty awful money managers … although you probably proved that they are … they had to come and see you … how much did you charge BTW? 🙂
BTW, Wally I did giggle at this …
And I don’t feel much sympathy for those PS bludgers at the ABC or SBS let alone the low life tax payer bludging scumbags from Canberra who sit around on their fat arses all day
One shiny arse rubbishing other shiny arses … LOL!
Productivity, much?
Shoving other people’s money around on the chess board … win some, lose some (of other folk’s money) … but still get paid, I love pure cash flow business …
‘Elsewhere, the budget papers shine some light on the recent enthusiasm for states and territories to privatise assets, revealing $5 billion in federal infrastructure funding is up for grabs on a “first come, first served basis”.
‘That five-year program rewards states and territories with 15 per cent of the price of the asset sold if all the sale proceeds are for new infrastructure. This may explain why the Napthine government has come around to the idea of leasing the Port of Melbourne and selling the Rural Finance Corporation.’
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/federal-budget/federal-budget-2014-rail-link-misses-out-on-infrastructure-spend-in-victoria-20140513-3880s.html#ixzz31g0axw6R
‘Living up to Tony Abbott’s aspiration of being known as the ‘infrastructure prime minister’, infrastructure is the cornerstone of this budget. The $11.6 billion Infrastructure Growth
Package together with existing announced projects provides a total of $50 billion federal funding infrastructure commitment over the next 6 years.
‘This funding, combined with state and private sector, is expected to generate a total of $125 billion investment in infrastructure across the nation. This substantial infrastructure investment will help support Australia’s productivity in the long term and will be important in the short term in generating economic activity as the economy transitions from resource investment led growth.’
Paul Foxlee, National Head of Transport & Infrastructure (KPMG)
… and the case for a review of the super concessions as, sb, has succinctly pointed out … “”
I like giving them concessions in what we call the “”Accumulation Phase”” but in the “Pension Phase”” they do need to be looked at.
But if 4% (risk free) is the common bank interest rate now lets say then for a couple they should be able to earn $80K (meaning $2M x 4%) without too much tax. The tax free threshold for them should be the amount of the full pension anyway afterall the couple on a pension get that by very definition tax free.
What happens from then on is the real question
And if the have a house worth more than $2 but no super then the government should be able to pay them a pension with a growing negative mortgage over the house until the last on carks it.
Otherwise the kids just get it and come to me and I throw it into their super fund.
“”… how much did you charge BTW? “”…………………….Hehehehehehehehe……………plenty
Wally – you really do highlight the fact that the people actually living just off the pension are the ones to suffer in this … not those with capital and a part pension …
But if 4% (risk free) is the common bank interest rate now lets say then for a couple they should be able to earn $80K (meaning $2M x 4%) without too much tax. The tax free threshold for them should be the amount of the full pension anyway afterall the couple on a pension get that by very definition tax free.
BTW that $80k is tax free too! And you seem to agree that’s where the government should have pointed its witch hunt … but guess what? And guess why?
Let’s hit the poor folk … ideology at work …
Just found this link
http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/government-debt_gov-debt-table-en
Govt debt in 2008 was 13.9% of GDP. In 2013 it is now 34.4% of GDP and rapidly increasing.
We are in big trouble.
No need to panic Neil, the adults have their hands on the leavers.
Phillip O’Neill, Professorial Research Fellow, Urban Research Centre at University of Western Sydney (Conversation)
‘It is heartening that federal politicians continue to acknowledge the need for raised infrastructure expenditure. It is disappointing, though, that the Coalition government has not shown any intention to explore new options for funding and delivering the infrastructure services needed in an advanced 21st century economy.
‘Australian financial institutions are seen worldwide as successful innovators in infrastructure financing. So too, Australian infrastructure constructors and operators are world leaders.
‘Yet our governments, state and federal, seem incapable of harnessing this expertise to develop a new suite of world-leading, sustainable, productive infrastructure. Australian firms are leading infrastructure designers and providers offshore. Unfortunately we currently lack the political will and imagination to mobilise these at home.’
No need to panic Neil, the adults have their hands on the leavers.
… that last word says it all … is “leavers”* another weasel word for elderly people?
… even if you could spell it would have impact … older people don’t like being levered …
‘….is “leavers”* another weasel word for elderly people?’
chuckle *
That’s my second spelling mistake today, earlier I said Abbott’s strategy was cleaver. In other news…
———
She is the little old lady who gave Prime Minister Tony Abbott a massive serve on live TV.
‘But since 85-year-old Vilma Ward’s segment on Network Ten’s Wake Up went viral on Wednesday it has emerged she has strong ties to the Labor party and was selected by the show’s producers.
‘Ms Ward, a former ALP member, told MailOnline she was called by Ten last week and she had ‘no idea’ why she was selected.’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2627862/Wake-Up-Fake-Up-The-real-story-Vilma-pensioner-blasted-Tony-Abbott-budget-live-TV.html#ixzz31gMc7MuQ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
“No need to panic Neil, the adults have their hands on the leavers.”
Yep but if there was an election now the Coalition would lose.
Most ALP supporters think money grows on trees, Debt is not a problem, we are sovereign in our own currency and we can print money to get out of our problems.
They are of course insane but the insane people are close to gaining govt.
“I was assuming the money was put in prior to that.”
Fair enough.
“I’m in my late 50s.”
I’ve never mentioned my age. TB always asks (see above), or he’ll ask what you do for a living. I never tell him. It must drive him crazy. 😀
l see Tinfoil`osy is at it again on the `super` front. Under Costello `super` WAS a tax-haven for the rich, (armchair and l already arse-fcuked you on the other thread, despite your hit and run)
and `super` could still be seen as a benefit for the `rich` to receive a`tax-discount`, particularly by those of us that earn too little to afford `any` size salary sacrifice,
if you can sock away the $30K.p.a into `super` then you should consider yourself `blessed`, as many don`t even earn $30K.p.a
” (armchair and l already arse-fcuked you on the other thread, despite your hit and run)”
Only in your medication-addled dreams, fuckwad.
‘Yep but if there was an election now the Coalition would lose.’
So he won’t risk a Double Dissolution?
” (armchair and l already arse-fcuked you on the other thread, despite your hit and run)”
As I recall it, you didn’t even understand there was a cap of $25k (or $35k for the more mature)
Generally misrepresentation is your greatest skill, best you leave actual debate to people with a grasp of “facts”
“as many don`t even earn $30K.p.a”
Perhaps if you had paid attention in class and learned how to express yourself properly you might have slipped into a higher tax bracket. Or learned to be civil occasionally.
””’As I recall it, you didn’t even understand there was a cap of $25k (or $35k””’
l didn`t know the `latest` on it, the `cap`, which is `about` 12-months old, for the #16-years before that, l was 100% correct, armchair too.
.
”””misrepresentation is your”””
misrepresentation was all Tinfoil`osys at the time,
trying to pretend the `cap` had always existed, not `recently` restored
“l didn`t know the `latest` on it, the `cap`, which is `about` 12-months old, for the #16-years before that, l was 100% correct, armchair too.”
Wrong again, dumbass. Look it up.
”””’medication-addled dreams, fuckwad.”””’
”””learned to be civil occasionally.”””’ #teabags
`wrong again`
which point Tinfoil`osy,
(you like to say `wrong` but never put an explainer or relevant link)
You like to run off at the mouth when you’ve no idea what you’re talking about.
””You like to run off at the mouth when you’ve no idea what you’re talking about.””
ls that running of at the mouth on 1.foxtardnews-ratings, 2.Flying-single-use#trashCans or 3.No-benefit-at-the-bottom-superannuation Tinfoil`osy
(The fact that you don’t know where you’re wrong proves my point.)
“Concessional contributions are limited to $25,000 per person per year, from 1 July, 2009. A transitional cap of $50,000 per year applies for the financial years 2009/10 to 2011/12.”
1996 to 2007, Costello/Howard Regime, Unlimited.? Tinfoil`osy True/False.?
Look it up.
Click to access History-of-superannuation.pdf
hey TB, Mr-Rabbit`s budget has produced some funny results,
first, Clive was highly agro about the budget on my abc1 breakfastnews,
2nd, Noddy and the other premiers seem to be siding with Clive in their dislike of Mr-Rabbits budget, (as l predicted last night)
and finally, Windsor and Oakshot are fully vindicated for not siding with the teabags in 2010, their decision was 100%, this budget proves it
“l didn`t know the `latest` on it, the `cap`, which is `about` 12-months old, for the #16-years before that, l was 100% correct, armchair too.”
Maybe about 0% correct.
armchair too
AO has credibility here, you’re probably hoping some will rub off, but I wouldn’t count on it. AO uses facts, you might try it too sometime.
Bagz is trying to align himself with some of the left-leaning stalwarts on the panel.
Without success, apparently.
“l see Tinfoil`osy is at it again on the `super` front. Under Costello `super` WAS a tax-haven for the rich, (armchair and l already arse-fcuked you on the other thread, despite your hit and run)”
What was that about hit-and-run?
‘Calling superannuation “tax concessions for the rich” is class warfare and the politics of envy.’
I stand by that statement. 😉
Great Budget..political suicide… the rabbits out of the hat and fuck me its a Rat.. One term Tone..oh well reheated rancid Rabbit and shit stew pretending to be filet mignon was never gonna work
Is it just me or does everyone else consider Squeal a “not quite right”
Oh that explains it.
“Bagz is trying to align himself with some of the left-leaning stalwarts on the panel.”
LOL
It can be lonely being the only dumb arse around here Left or Right
“BTW that $80k is tax free too! ”
Oops sorry I forgot that bit.
Anyway I’m not a fan of stopping people accumulating a shitload. I prefer taxing the income from MASSIVE LUMP SUMS in the super funds
And restricting lump sum withdrawals especially those contributed by employers over the years . That is there to provide an income not a fucking holiday
””””’tax concessions for the rich” is class warfare and the politics of””unfairness, at the end of the day, the `salary-sacrifice` section particularly,
IS ””tax concessions for the rich””as l said before,
if you(the-richer) can sock away the $30K.p.a into `super` then you should consider yourself `blessed`, as many don`t even earn $30K.p.a
AND half-time employment=half-time `super` #teabags
(Let’s face it: if Smoky Joe and the Bandits are right (as per their recent 7:30 Reportland appearance), and grateful employees work for the generous corporate sector, whose especially vehicular heavy-lifting is to give individual taxpayers opportunity for jobs and roads, roads, roads of all sorts in the driven economy; then, every clean-sweeper and truckie’s mate is destined to be a CEO receiving a sizeable share package, if only they work hard enough; and that’s just how society is: make-their-own-lucks and lottery-of-life-loser-dumbf*cks.)
(Actually, does anyone know how diesel gets to mining sites, and diesel refiners get to work at refineries, since Joe resolved the purpose of the diesel subsidy v. fuel levy argument; prolly by ship and rail, I guess??)
Tinfoil`osy, l still reckon that any `blurt` about `super` that ignores both `welfare/pension` and `employment-conditions` is largely bullshit, as they are all entwined, `super` under keating, was meant to give some relief to the `pension/welfare` system, under the John-W teabags, employment for many was trashed, along with their `super` prospects(even if it was an `accidental` by-product), so now canberra is STILL stuck with providing `pensions/welfare`, or following teh-usa model, ramping-up the prison/law-enforcement aspects, which is about 12x the `welfare` cost
disclaimer, l hated keatings guts, made me skin crawl, but l DO acknowledge his planning for the boomer bubble, and `super` planning were largely bang-on in the relief on the `pension/welfare` system, and the flow-on benefits to the general economy, by keeping the `retired` in active service as consumers,
the stupid fcuking teabags trashed this
(Erm, the so-called “teabags” did no such thing; nor did they implicitly trash Keating’s ideas about the importance of ‘automatic stabilisers’ in maintaining a healthy economy over a cycle; cuz, it makes perfect sense to reduce the potential volume and velocity of money in a potential recessionary environment, by undermining the (un)employment safety net, now, while the rate is relatively low, on the basis that the so-called “teabags” will definitely restore the safety net in the midsts of an actual recessionary environment, and thereby safeguard stability for the long-term.)
“`super` under keating, was meant to give some relief to the `pension/welfare` system, under the John-W teabags, employment for many was trashed, along with their `super` prospects”
Which is also uninformed crap. Neil will tell you the unemployment rates under Keating compared to those under Howard. Or – here’s an idea – why not look it up yourself before spilling your stupid guts all over the place.
#moron
‘opportunity for jobs and roads, roads, roads of all sorts in the driven economy’
He wants to give people a taste of infrastructure building at a piddling cost, leaving rail building to foreigners.
Meta its clear to me that Australia will be a different country within a decade.
Yep= unemployment was high under Keating
Sept-Dec 1991- 10.1, 10.0, 10.2, 10.4
Jan-Dec 1992- 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 11.0, 11.0, 10.8, 10.7, 11.0, 11.0, 11.2
Jan-Dec1993- 10.9, 11.0, 10.8, 10.7, 10.8, 11.0, 10.8, 11.0, 10.7, 10.9, 10.8, 10.6
Jan-April 1994- 10.4, 10.3, 10.3, 10.1
Several years of DD unemployment. Nothing like it since the Great Depression.
Amazingly Keating went to an election with unemployment at 11% and won the election. That is something a Coalition govt could never do.
And it is not surprising to me that Superannuation is not working like it is supposed to. If people can spend their lump sum payments and then go on the pension they will.
‘will definitely restore the safety net in the midsts of an actual recessionary environment’
It looks dodgy I know, but it stands to reason that any government would restore the dole to the under 30s in a deep recession, otherwise robberies would go through the roof as young people try to avoid starvation. Its unlikely that we would see hundreds of them begging in the street for enough to buy a big mac and a bottle of their favourite intoxicant.
No that won’t happen, so rest easy, restoration is a given because we are not a third world country.
‘AUSTRALIA’S skills shortage threatens to send more companies and jobs offshore unless the government “significantly” lowers the English-language requirements for temporary foreign workers, a leading industry group says.
‘In a submission to the independent review of the 457 visa program obtained by The Australian, Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox warns that language requirements are shrinking the pool of people who can apply for the skilled migration program.’
Hepworth / Oz
‘An $80b cut to federal grants for schools, hospitals over next decade sparks near rebellion from the states.’
SMH
So he won’t risk a Double Dissolution?
He’s threatening to … but based on track record so far that means he won’t …
If push came to shove he would have no alternative other than to go to the people.
If push comes to shove Abbott will back down on some of the budget measures. There is no way he will go to a DD if there is a risk he would lose, much less now when it is a certainty.
Abbott is more likely to surrender every “reform”, rather than go to a double dissolution right now,
His reputation will be about as good as Gillard’s in a couple of months. His only asset is that Shorten is unelectable.
Teabagz: wrong on –
X Superannuation
X Unemployment
X Grammar
X Nonstop use of Americanisms
‘Abbott will back down on some of the budget measures.’
That would be safer, but what can he jettison?
Tom.. Abbott lied his way into office, continues to arduously fibricate to the blind brain dead lemmings that voted for him. He holds the entire nation; especially those sane people who knew he was not to be trusted with utter contempt….. This contemptuous compulsive liar is incapable of anything that remotely resembles truth. The truth means nothing to Abbott as Dr Hewson, Tony Windsor and the litany of political and business people past and present who have had the Phoney experience can attest. :-)…
Abbott would rather bum a gay, black muslim refugee cleric on a boat on the Bolt report than stick to his word of a dissolution.
Bring it on…like now, this fucker needs the cold steel blade of his own lying reality plunged through his black heart by a heart of pensioners with disabilities… I will paraphrase him “let the voters deride decide”
Poor Squeals predictably stuck in the mid 90’s convincing himself that the greatest PM and treasurer is no good as he is in shock by how we have been
fist fiscally fucked by these scumbags.I’ve never mentioned my age. TB always asks (see above), or he’ll ask what you do for a living. I never tell him. It must drive him crazy.
Quite frankly I couldn’t give a fuck … ToSY, … rhetorical questions are just that … and I can assure you I sleep soundly and never dream about you …
=========================================
And restricting lump sum withdrawals especially those contributed by employers over the years . That is there to provide an income not a fucking holiday
All our super was personal (none from employers) and we live off, it as you know … but what we do is “skim” the earnings (ie draw a lump sum) every six months or so … some of that goes into fixed interest in the bank for three or four months and rest goes into our budget the rest …
So you see we’d be against restrictions on lump sum withdrawals (but we have already devised a work around if it happens anyway)
I guess unless you are personally involved you don’t see all angles … like anything …
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
His reputation will be about as good as Gillard’s in a couple of months. His only asset is that Shorten is unelectable.
Ain’t that the troof!
And Clivey had his best interview with Tony Jones on Lateline last night …
Given a DD, Clivey might win my vote …
Go Clivey!
At risk of being inappropriatelt declared a ‘moralising moraliser’, I present this…
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/14/budget-it-will-be-chaplains-not-secular-social-workers-at-schools
There is something particularly ideologically obscene about a government making real cuts to the broader health & education systems…but finding extra millions to continue the infiltration of (let’s face it, they won’t be anything other than) Christian chaplains into (what should be) secular schools.
At the same time ensuring that trained, secular counsellors and social workers are virtually precluded.
Not logically defensible, I’d have thought.
“Schools will lose the option of appointing secular social workers under the national school chaplaincy program, for which the Abbott government has found an extra $245m in budget funding.
While flagging big cuts to future school spending growth, the Coalition’s first budget earmarks the funding over five years to continue the chaplaincy scheme originally put into place by John Howard.
But the education minister, Christopher Pyne, confirmed he would axe an option put in place by the Labor government for schools to opt for non-religious student welfare worker as an alternative to a chaplain providing “pastoral care”.
“Counsellors and social workers in schools are really the responsibility of the states and territories,” Pyne told Guardian Australia on Wednesday.”
Conservative scum.
Lying, cheating, thieving, hypocritical, cynical and cruel ,Conservative scum.
Wondered where you were? 🙂
It really isn’t that difficult to deduce ToSY’s likely age to within a fairly narrow spectrum.
I think divulging personal information is a prerogative which needs to be carefully weighed up. We’ve all seen the way that certain blog dwellers can use the circumstances of others in a predatory fashion; only too eager to pounce upon the slimmest morsel. TB, I’m sure you’ve been personally attacked on many occasions by multiple assailants because you’ve allowed much to be known. Personally, I applaud your frankness.
I think that personal divulgement does help to articulate a person’s opinion better. However, I understand the want/need to not be entirely transparent too.
“Wondered where you were? ”
I’m always about. Just very busy offline in recent times.
As far as the budget goes…it smells very ideological in nature to me. Pretty much what we all should expect.
The school chaplain’s thing just serves to highlight the wilful deception at work as various cuts are rhetorically justified by the government.
I think divulging personal information is a prerogative which needs to be carefully weighed up.
Absolutely agree …
I think that personal divulgement does help to articulate a person’s opinion better.
Exactly my reason for doing it …
I expect/like people to know “why” I argue certain points from a certain perspective … but that’s me … digs at my age are unwelcome … especially if they imply I don’t know what’s going on in the world around me.
Taking The Minister to lunch.
‘…digs at my age are unwelcome … especially if they imply I don’t know what’s going on in the world around me.’
LOL
“I expect/like people to know “why” I argue certain points from a certain perspective”
Me too. But I’ve grown very cynical about letting much ‘real world’ information free (something which I was probably much more guilty of in the past). Too often, when someone does expose themselves, I see the information used (by others) either to detract/deflect from what they’re actually trying to say…or worse still, a tool to locate them outside of the internet.
” especially if they imply I don’t know what’s going on in the world around me.”
Anyone who is seriously making that claim is obviously deliberately misrepresenting you.
‘Even more strikingly, most of the revenue growth, over and above the normal growth in the economy, will come from rising personal income tax; and a huge part of that will be from the silent but all-too real tax increase of bracket creep.
‘Over the four years net personal income tax revenues are going to leap by an astonishing $61 billion. All the other taxes, including company tax and the GST — and which right now rake in more than personal tax — will only increase by $38 billion.’
Terry McCrann
I believe the numbers provided in the budget more than those provided when Wayne Swan was Treasurer. This is SWan in 2012-13
“The four years of surpluses I announce tonight are a powerful endorsement of the strength of our economy, resilience of our people, and success of our policies………..This Budget delivers a surplus this coming year, on time, as promised, and surpluses each year after that, strengthening over time.”
The 4 next budgets announced by Swan in 2012 were supposed to give us surpluses of $1.5B, $2B, $5B and then $7.5B.
The question should be asked is how corrupt is Wayne Swan?? How did he force the Commonwealth to publish such obviously wrong information??
The circus continues at ICAC:
“It really isn’t that difficult to deduce ToSY’s likely age to within a fairly narrow spectrum.”
Have a go if you like. I’ll tell you if you’re right. 😉
42
And it is not surprising to me that Superannuation is not working like it is supposed to. If people can spend their lump sum payments and then go on the pension they will.
I’m glad that this problem has been identified neil, tell me, what is the coalition doing about it?
I really hope we have a DD, did abbott make that a promise too, anyone know? Looking forward to some excitement as our government hangs by a thread! Pretty sure that abbott hasn’t the guts for it though and mr congenial shorten would have to get some backbone steel and fire in the belly, he’d be a nervous wreck throughout!
Will these microphone and media warriors be up for a real test of their political courage? that is the question.
“Wondered where you were? ”
yes, me too, I was starting to get worried that you might have had enough of some of the tiresome prattle of this place in recent times and needing a break. Happy to see you today ❤
‘The mining magnate accused the government of exaggerating the nation’s debt levels to manufacture a crisis and justify moving to “a total capitalist economy” in which money, not people, was all that mattered.’
Taylor / Guardian
Have a go if you like. I’ll tell you if you’re right. 😉
56?
‘I really hope we have a DD, did abbott make that a promise too, anyone know?’
It was mooted over the carbon tax and that chance will come up with the new senate, because its the immediate trigger, whereas stopping the budget might take longer to unravel.
We’ll soon see if he has any political nous.
At risk of being inappropriatelt declared a ‘moralising moraliser’, I present this…
I see no moralising in objecting to secular schools being forced to have representatives of religion in them, chaplains masquerading as counsellors. If there is a variety of students with different faiths there should also be representatives for all those religions in schools, not only christians eg judaism, muslim, buddhism etc.
i will be very interested in the outcome of the second high court challenge taking place currently from the toowoomba man who won his first case on this issue.
Wow TB, seems like Clive may just turn out to be the Iceberg as opposed to the Titanic…One Term Tony has a big fat Obstacle standing right in front of his ideology.. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the scariest prospect in Australian political history… Clive Palmer may be the only sane person in parliament…
Be afraid , be very afraid…they walk amongst us… Cmon Squeals catch up…only 5 more years to go and your in the now 🙂
So I’m thinkin that Abbott hasn’t got the plumbs to hit the double dissolution button.. may try and wrap this stuff up in a supply bill to ambush Labor on a no block convention….
They have tried the must happen “budget emergency” lie and it wont cut electorally. Pyne is the negotiator (their fucked right there) but its all gonna happen in the Senate with Abets (their fucked right there too) . Based upon Labor and the greens plus PUP’s ..Fiberals haven’t got a hope in hell with at least 5 of these ideology measures… They are great at being dictatorial but negotiation…all piss no steam.
What are your thoughts? (Sweals you are excluded, its 052014 )
More on the DD issues highlighted.
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/5/7/politics/will-abbott-play-double-dissolution-roulette
(their fucked right there too)
I think what you actually mean is “they’re fucked right there too” but I take your point.
“You’re such a cunt’ is NOT @billshortenmp’s correct name https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zyMGOgpeV0 …
“convincing himself that the greatest PM and treasurer is no good ”
The Hawke/Keating govt did not have any good economic numbers anytime, anywhere.
And it looks like Superannuation is not working. One of the few good things i think Keating did. And i can see a time in the future when the next socialist govt gets in they will trash the budget so bad we will be forced to liquidate a portion of our Super savings. So i stopped salary sacrificing and used the extra money i got to pay down my mortgage.
Based upon Labor and the greens plus PUP’s ..Fiberals haven’t got a hope in hell with at least 5 of these ideology measures… They are great at being dictatorial but negotiation…all piss no steam.
Clive’s all over the place telling everyone that there is no budget crisis, quoting OECD figures and saying it’s a mean, heartless & cruel budget, he’s cutting through with those who are fed up and frustrated with their wishes being ignored by the two majors and their political corruption. He’s the hanson phenomenon again and she got the coalition threatened enough to have her put in jail and then take on all her policies.
Clive has insider knowledge, knows just how the coalition operate and knows where the bodies are buried…and he means to bring them to their knees.
Hell hath no fury like a billionaire scorned 🙂
“Have a go if you like. I’ll tell you if you’re right.”
I will refrain, confident in my personal deductions over the years. Besides which, I believe that may be a loaded assertion…ie. I’ll tell you if you’re correct (unstated is- only if you guess precisely years months & days + hospital you were born in). 😉
The spectrum I suspect is between my own age (38.5ish) & 45. If I’m incorrect, you certainly have a few non-specific generationally specific interests. 🙂
I very much doubt that the current government would bet the farm on a DD at the moment.
I may even vote if they did. They’ve pissed off a few of their core arselickers in these parts.
I think what you actually mean is “they’re fucked right there too” but I take your point.
they’re fucked everywhere, especially in their heads.
thank you reb, we have missed the pedantic punctuation police 😆
You’re welcome AO..
BTW the clip I posted at 12:39 is recommended viewing…. 🙂
yeah, i saw that reb, unreal that he wasn’t picked up on it or that labor did not object strongly and all walk out or something.
I didn’t hear ‘grub’, it sure sounded like the c-word to me, what do you reckon?
The OUTRAGE!!!
Yep.. thatz fanks thanks Reb, combine dyslexia with a phone that is a paranoid android and i’m fucked right there 🙂 they’re most certainly; as AO points out, both politically and between the ears.. 50 shades of fucked.
Think his flux capacitor is on the blink, can’t get forward in the space time continuum to 2014 🙄
The numbers game in the senate will be interesting and I agree AO Clive has a score to settle, beep pockets, deep hatred and plenty of ammo at the moment… Newman and Abbott are just gifting him stupidity. The more they paint him as an idiot, the more support he will garnish as a wedge.
What’s the bingo call for DD? two squashed plumbs?
“I’ll tell you if you’re correct (unstated is- only if you guess precisely years months & days + hospital you were born in).”
But, but, I wasn’t born in a hospital. 😉
Actually, I’m not really worried about internet stalkers and the like. It’s mainly for work reasons that I like to remain anonymous.
Wat?
“It’s mainly for work reasons that I like to remain anonymous.”
Also a legitimate concern. No one wants to be publically exposed as a gravedigger.
Def the C bomb… he may not understand what it means, not actually having seen one in the flesh 🙂
You’re likely safe from internet stalkers, given your general alignment. Most of the vindictive loose units seem to lean right 😆 …think Inane et al. 🙂
“50 shades of fucked”
LOL… 🙂
Exactly.
“he may not understand what it means, not actually having seen one in the flesh” 😯
“Actually, I’m not really worried about internet stalkers and the like.”
Internet stalkers don’t elicit pantwetting in me either…but I do have family which I can’t ‘protect’ 24hrs a day. And a job, obviously; which is subject to a confidentiality agreement.
‘The mister will refer to members by their correct names.’
lol
“he may not understand what it means, not actually having seen one in the flesh”
⭐ 😆
Gasp! The Guardian uses the “c” word….
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/15/christopher-pyne-denies–c-word-against-bill-shorten?CMP=soc_568
‘The mincer will refer to members by their correct names.’
”””unemployment rates under Keating compared”””
l never said ””un/employment rates””’
Tinfoil`osy, #moron l still reckon that any `blurt` about `super` that ignores both `welfare/pension` and #`employment-conditions`# is largely bullshit, as they are all entwined, `super` under keating, was meant to give some relief to the `pension/welfare` system, under the John-W teabags, employment(#conditions-ie.serf-choice) for many was trashed, along with their `super` prospects(even if it was an `accidental` by-product), so now canberra is STILL stuck with providing `pensions/welfare`, or following teh-usa model, ramping-up the prison/law-enforcement aspects, which is about 12x the `welfare` cost
”””is NOT @billshortenmp’s correct name”””
Mr-Poodle has finally said something l agree with,
it`s only taken him 15 years 🙂
My comprehension has never been too good, so I’m really struggling to understand what you are trying to say bagz.
BTW the clip I posted at 12:39 is recommended viewing….
As I’ve said before the liars accuse others, like thieves, hypocrites … and we all know who’s really the c**t in that little triad!
””””””””””’Clive has insider knowledge, knows just how the coalition operate and knows where the bodies are buried…and he means to bring them to their knees.
Hell hath no fury like a billionaire scorned”””””””’
Agree armchair. lt would quite funny if these teabag premiers mr-rabbit is pissing on became pups too. lt was quite good to see noddy, other premier/s `and` clive calling out mr-rabbits crap. The double-diss talk is just that, the zombies would be swept away if mr-rabbit pulled the double-diss trigger. 🙂
When Sqweals hero: ‘ im a fucking liar but I am actually honest on this ocasion and theres a forst for everything’ JOHN….says the budget.is shit.. then its a rank sloppy steamer.
But, but, I wasn’t born in a hospital.
A barn?
“A barn?”
A taxi. 😉
In the last shower?
Under a wandering star?
A taxi.
That’s a strange coincidence, that’s where I was conceived.
A taxi.
I suppose that leads to the question of where you were conceived … same place I suppose … 😮
Great minds, ToM! 😆
“Under a wandering star?”
In a manger.
I found your comment very intelligent and amusing TB.
hatched at teh institute
Ahahahahaha…GOLD!
They probably all were little cunts too, in Pyne’s defence.
The fact that they weren’t all throwing steel rulers & one armed scissors at his head certainly doesn’t bode well for their judgement.
‘The double-diss talk is just that, the zombies would be swept away if mr-rabbit pulled the double-diss trigger.’
If a hostile senate rejects the budget then he has nothing to lose by going to a DD, except the election.
I found your comment very intelligent and amusing TB.
Likewise, ToM, very quick and extremely clever uptake …
Does the Payne gaffe indicate a government minister under pressure?
Typical, Private School Bullies, seems the senior prefect, Tony, has been let loose to become, Lord of the Flies …
Or Godzilla?
if you remember back to pre-election dumpty, l have always said mr-rabbit is a dud, and he does have the talent to be a `lame-duck`, with pups breathing down his neck peeling away teabags to his pups, and the attempt to screw the premiers, mr-rabbit very well may end-up being a lame-duck #Go-Clive #Go-Watermelon 🙂
****COMING UP TONIGHT****
Bill Shorten’s Budget Right of Reply…
Will Bill deliver it or Anthony Albanese??
We cross LIVE to the Green Room where Bill Shorten’s Spin Doctor is rehearsing how to feign anger and use foul language…
‘mr-rabbit very well may end-up being a lame-duck’
With the endorsement of the Coalition I suspect he will go to war, a lame duck position would be untenable.
With the endorsement of the Coalition I suspect he will go to war …
He’s a bit slow then, most of the country is at war with him!
We cross LIVE to the Green Room where Bill Shorten’s Spin Doctor is rehearsing how to feign anger and use foul language…
That’s Bill’s, spin doc, alright!
I must say these new WordPress smileys really are crap! 😡
Go the mighty fkn Crows!!!!1111one!!!
(Fuck Collingwood.)
‘He’s a bit slow then, most of the country is at war with him!’
It doesn’t look good, but he’s confident a DD would kill PUP. This might be a major miscalculation, now that Clive is saying things people want to hear.
Just heard Shorten say in his budget reply speech that Labor handed the Coalition low debt and a triple A credit rating.
He forgot to mention that in 2007 we not only had no debt but we had money in the bank.
It just proves to me that the ALP and its supporters have no shame.
Labor claims credit for things they are not capable of.
Wow! Bill delivered his most compelling speech yet tonight…
And those smirking toffee nosed wankers opposite just looked like the privileged little pack of snivelling private school bullies he so masterfully depicted them as.
Well done Bill!
And once again.
Bill Shortens speech shows ALP supporters have no shame.
Shorten: “If you want an election try us. If you think Labor is too weak bring it on.”
as much as it pains me, and as much as l dislike shortmen,
l have to admit his reply-speech was correct
Yes lets vote Labor back in.
Rack up the debt and then we can print money to pay off the debt.
No problems we can just print money. No need to work. No need to do anything.
We can just print money to pay off everything.
yeah, l noticed that too, the teabags looked quite crook during shortmens speech
It remains to be seen wevver Bill can cut froo.
Are you looking forward to Christmas Neil?
Bill didn’t mention infrastructure once.
I want more $900 cheques.
Rudd gave me one why does not Abbott do the same??
Bill actually mentioned infrastructure once, in passing Bill said he would like to see quality infrastructure.
http://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/federal-budget-2014-bill-shortens-speech/story-fn84fgcm-1226919328436
What new smilies TB.? Got a Link.?
l can`t see any smilies, l`m just seeing the keyboard characters eg*roll*,
(between colons of course)
if shortmen and clive jam-up the budget in the senate a couple of times, will that force a double-diss under our system
Shorten did well.
He placed the former Opposition’s pre-election lies within the context of ideological difference.
The lies can now be seen for what they always were, distortion or absolute denial of truth which enabled a Machiavellian manipulation of people to fool them into voting for a government which had the hidden intent to dismantle the very foundations of our society.
The ALP looked focused, united and committed for the first time in ages. Lots of red ties and jackets.
The other team looked blue about the gills.
They know what they did.
Wow Dianne.
What drugs are you on??
I bet you think like most ALP supporters we have no problems. And if we do we can just print money to solve all problems.
Section 57 of the Australian Constitution details the conditions for a double dissolution:
The House of Representatives passes a bill and sends it to the Senate.
The Senate rejects or fails to pass the bill, or passes it with amendments to which the House will not agree.
Three months pass from the time the Senate disagrees with the bill.
The House of Representatives passes the same bill and sends it to the Senate again.
The Senate again rejects or fails to pass the bill, or passes the same bill with amendments to which the House will not agree.
More than one bill may act as a trigger for a double dissolution.
———–
Of course the fast trigger is the carbon tax, primed and ready to go when the new senate steps up.
somebody still needs to be fired out of the chicken cannon l see
thanks for the double-diss refresher dumpty,
yeah, the gas-tax, and just about everything in the budget ta`boot
I missed Bill’s speech.
Was it really ok? I struggle to believe that, because he’s such a tool.
If the Budget bills are rejected then there is a 3 month wait, whereas the tax dismantling bill is up for its second try.
Even if he calls a DD on that alone, everything in the Budget will then become embroiled in the election debate.
Abetz is horse trading with the cross benches to stop the trigger being activated.
Crows were impressive and its a popular win.
Take your blindfold off Neil.
This budget is deeply ideological, imposed on people who were assured there would be no cuts, no shocks, no surprises.
If all the measures are imposed it will place us on a wide toll road to a place un recognizable as Fair Go Australia.
There are other ways to deal with long term structural problems rather than swinging the wrecking ball.
Hopefully the ALP will not borrow our leader’s tactics and yell ‘liar’ at him every time he speaks. I would be hoping for a measured and constructive discussion on the type of country we want to be, what sacrifices must be made and how we can become that creative, clever bunch we are always hearing about.
What impressed me about Shorten’s Budget supply is that he made a start in that direction and for once he sounded as if he really cared.
Poor Squeals.. Hero Johnnie Howard recons the budget is shit… “A tax hike” ….Squeals, as always seems confused, hurt and bitter by the prospect that his faux
prophetsprofits are buckling under the shear weight of ideology, lies and broken promises…The veil has lifted to reveal the true
cuntsgrubsJoe’s giving us perspective, he’s a champion…”its only a couple of middies, less than a packet of winnie blues… per doctors visit” he gleefully articulates… Pyne o potty says “a degree is less than one hundred Brazilians or two matching diamond labia piercings” I’m glad these teagbaggers, have such a clear picture of how real people fink 🙄
‘There are other ways to deal with long term structural problems rather than swinging the wrecking ball.’
Doubt that. Just as Howard and Costello were draconian in cleaning up after Labor, Abbott and Hockey need to be tough to get us back in the black.
‘I would be hoping for a measured and constructive discussion on the type of country we want to be….’
The people have already spoken, that’s why Labor is in Opposition, and if they obstruct the government in that ‘other place’ then it will be a double dizzy.
If I’m not mistaken a majority of the electorate would again vote for economic rationalism and progress over misplaced charity and squander.
‘THE indigenous leader who helped trigger the government’s Closing the Gap response says Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders should be exempt from the Medicare co-payment until their health is on a par with other Australians.’
Laurie / Oz
The Bolter would call that racist.
“Section 57 of the Australian Constitution details the conditions for a double dissolution”
Thanks for that Egg.
No wonder you and Squeals agree Egg you are completely full of shit, you will both be very happy in your
bogblog 🙂‘you will both be very happy in your bog blog’
Two straight men in an empty room won’t attract much traffic, especially if they are in general agreement.
Rudd gave me one why does not Abbott do the same??
And I didn’t get a red cent, Kneel … nor did most self funded retirees …
if shortmen and clive jam-up the budget in the senate a couple of times, will that force a double-diss under our system
Not necessarily … but it will slow down ’em down … they need to deny the government Supply of funds to prompt a DD …
The people have already spoken, that’s why Labor is in Opposition
Not quite true, egg, either you are also lying and being deceitful or you really don’t understand what is actually happening …
The Labor Party lost because of its leadership struggles … despite that they had put in place programs that the tories had openly agreed to and claimed commitment to during an election … during the same election they had promised NOT to do exactly what they did …
… in the real world that is actually illegal – breach of contract (ie we pay for an expected service but don’t get it) … like hiring a manager who suddenly cleans out the stock of expensive shoes and replaces them with Payless seconds, rehires incompetent lawyer and economists as sale people and argues with the bank over the business loan … as clients walk away and don’t buy anything – you’d fire them for incompetence …
At the very least, breach of promise … another legal offence … in the real world …
‘The Labor Party lost because of its leadership struggles …’
And a pernicious tax.
You are correct in saying that they have gone back on their word, that’s politics.
“You are correct in saying that they have gone back on their word, that’s politics.”
True. The last PM to do that was haunted by her broken promises which saw her booted out. That’s politics.
For what it is worth ….
Neo -liberalism is inherently unequal. Rich get richer. Corporations challenge government in wealth, power and influence. Those without wealth, power and influence become cogs.
Previous governments including Howard, in a big way, ameliorated inequity with one-off payments, tax breaks and subsidies. Now this govt claims that is unsustainable. Solution. Remove all or most of those measures. Punch holes in safety net.
End of Fair Go Australia.
I’m not confident Abetz and Pyne can persuade PUP to pass the budget without an infrastructure sweetener.
‘End of Fair Go Australia.’
Not really, but its probably the end of Third Way political economy.
Egg – ask the Google machine for info on Germany’s Mittelstand.
Equality is the opposite of a fair go. Fair is when those who work hard are better off.
The ideal is to give people opportunity not money. Australia is turning into a nation of mendicants. Dependency on government handouts is per se degrading.
Governments trying to give people equality usually end up as impoverished tyrannies. The more dependent individuals are on the state the more it controls them.
The job of government is to provide a system that allows people to support themselves and to provide a safety net for those that can’t. When the majority of people get payments from governments the system has failed and needs revision.
The hierarchy of government priorities is:
• to ensure that the country exists through defence and foreign policy;
• then to ensure through laws and infrastructure that the society is the one where most people can make a go of it and support themselves;
• then to provide short-term assistance to help put people in a position to make a go of it and
• finally to provide some support for those who are incapable of supporting themselves.
Leftists seem to have this arse-up.
Found this…
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21600146-chinese-companies-german-shopping-spree-benefiting-both-sides-mittelstand-and-middle-kingdom
Equality of opportunity means everyone gets a fair go.
I’m not confident Abetz and Pyne can persuade PUP to pass the budget without an infrastructure sweetener.
Especially when the major parties are colluding to execute all the minor parties … “because democracy is being distorted” … more like the major parties don’t like competition!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Equality of opportunity means everyone gets a fair go.
And there’s the rub and the barb of reality equality and fair go are just myths a figment of the imagination … its always been scrabbling to survive in a world controlled by avaricious, stupid Dickwits … as long as “they” are OK … the rest of us are just pawns to be controlled at whim …
Equality? Fair go? What BS …
Here’s an example of national “equality” and a “fair go” …
‘Equality? Fair go? What BS …’
Hierarchy structures exists in all societies, it appears to be natural. Equality of opportunity is the best we can hope for in the short to medium term.
TB, I thought you would have been happy to have worked hard (and smart) so that now you are relatively better off compared to most. I’ve worked hard at least, and I am happy with the outcome even if I need to keep working for another decade to have a secure retirement. Maybe I’m an optimist but the good thing about that is that I will probably be happy come what may.
A society which allows people to work hard and be rewarded is something we should aspire to.
…Hopefully the ALP will not borrow our leader’s tactics and yell ‘liar’ at him every time he speaks…
I think i can hear that word yelled at abbott and co for quite a while before I get sick of it. After all ‘juliar’ got a long run and changed the nation. Why should the chief wrecker be spared his own wrecking ball strategies? I prefer to see labor getting their aggro on sometimes. Taking the high road and always being pleasant and reasonable doesn’t always cut through imo. Sometimes a bit of passion is nice to see if they’re serious about it meaning something to them.
..Neo -liberalism is inherently unequal. Rich get richer. Corporations challenge government in wealth, power and influence. Those without wealth, power and influence become cogs…
And the welfare system is meant to support those ‘losers’ who have been tossed aside by a ravenous capitalism, now they want to remove the safety net and impose a plutocracy on us all. That’s ok as long as people are informed and know what they are voting for – but of course that is deliberately kept hidden. Pollies always misrepresent the voters best interests. I’ve been increasingly angered by the comments from abbott & hockey about “the national interest”, it seems the nation is separate from it’s people and what they want doesn’t matter. They are very careful never to ask the people what they want, they always tell us their ‘interpretation’ of our wishes and strangely, it always coincides with their plans or rhetoric.
Two straight men in an empty room won’t attract much traffic, especially if they are in general agreement…
I think it would be a matter of what was being said in that room that would ensure it’s emptiness. Wouldn’t matter if gay, straight, male, female or in between. The content would drive any visitors away!
‘The content would drive any visitors away!’
I meant straight man in comical deliverance, what Trash has cannot be replicated but anything I attempt would have to have a satirical bent. What do you think of NOOZE BEFORE IT ‘APPENS.
Would you have a special thread for discussion of “the greatest moral, economic and social challenge of our time”?
The Thought Police come down heavily on wayward spelling and comprehension, I should have said comical delivery.
AO – what I mean is I would not like to see the ALP using Abbott’s brutish tactics instead of elevating discussion about the very future of our society.
I don’t think that is going to happen, happily.
I am sure Shorten will call out the lies at every opportunity and that does not worry me in the slightest. He gave every indication that the ALP intends to fight for the things which bring a semblance of equity to this country, Medicare, state education being two pillars.
We are going to see a battle of ideologies and that is long overdue.
I meant straight man in comical deliverance,..
you and neil?
more like straight men in boring monotony 🙂
Mark Chapman from Taxpayers Australia: The budget for the true deceivers
http://www.independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/the-budget-for-the-true-deceivers,6480
‘We are going to see a battle of ideologies and that is long overdue.’
I tend to agree, both sides are saying bring it on. Not sure Bill has the ticker for a good stoush, Tanya would be better.
‘more like straight men in boring monotony’
I’ve been giggling at Neil’s recent comments, he’s a natural.
‘When his comedy partner behaves eccentrically, the straight man’s response ranges from aplomb to outrage, or from patience to frustration. He makes his partner look all the more ridiculous by being completely serious. He will often also be found in sitcoms.’
wiki
Equality of opportunity means everyone gets a fair go.
How is that equal opportunity going to happen when only the wealthy can get a tertiary education or be able to live off their parents for 6 mths if they are unemployed? if only the wealthy can have their health needs serviced and the poor have to pay to do the heavy hoisting of the wealthy parasites.
The US, whose basket case policies our politicians are determined to emulate is a great example of how equal opportunity does not reduce poverty.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/douglas-j-amy/equal-opportunity-wont-reduce-poverty_b_4755771.html
…Poverty is once again on the political agenda in America. And one of the most persistent myths surrounding this issue is that the best way to reduce poverty is to increase equal opportunity. This is a common idea among both liberals and conservatives. Many people believe, for instance, that if the poor had much better educational opportunities, the poverty rate would go down.
Unfortunately, this is not true. Improving opportunity and reducing poverty are actually two separate issues…
…That is because poverty is not caused by unequal opportunity. Unequal opportunity helps explain why certain groups of people tend to end up poor, but it does not explain why we have poverty. The real causes of poverty are two-fold: lack of jobs and too many jobs paying poverty-level wages…
I tend to agree, both sides are saying bring it on. Not sure Bill has the ticker for a good stoush, Tanya would be better.
If bill wants to be a PM, he’ll find the ticker or be replaced by albo.
Abbott will have the ticker but his policies and ideology [which is easily seen through, just look at his industry backers] are like selling poison.
Bring it on, it’ll only help us to see how much we desperately need new players and a new political system.
The only thing to be gained from Labor getting back into power is more debt and deficit and more inequality.
But lefties seem to like debt and deficit. Not sure why.
Debt and deficit eventually leads to cutbacks and austerity as govts try to find ways of getting unsustainable debt under control.
A society which allows people to work hard and be rewarded is something we should aspire to.
I agree … but tory governments the world over seem to want to keep the serfs as serfs … the only ones who play at class warfare are the wannabe Winstons of this world …
… work hard – just how do you define that?
TB, I thought you would have been happy to have worked hard (and smart) so that now you are relatively better off compared to most.
Thanks for compliment … and I am … The Minister and I don’t believe in gambling (we have the occasional flutter on Keno) but we do believe we were lucky … lucky enough to make our own opportunities and yes, exploit what attributes we have/had without hurting anyone … and we have encouraged a number of people along the way with their own journeys …
I can assure you that while I have, over the years, taken advantage of being a part of the ADF family, those two years cost me dearly … in time, retracing steps and lost income and opportunities …
The Minister and I live our lives via clichés … eg “learn the system and use it to your advantage”, “never make a profit from family or friends”, “always move forward”, “one door closes and another one opens”, “there’s always a way” etc and a firm belief in karma – even tho’ the old saying often rings in my ears – “no good turn goes unpunished” …
But we also recognise that while there is always someone smarter, more well off, better educated, fitter, more articulate, more sociable or knowledgeable etc …
… there are also those who don’t have any of those advantages … generally through the lottery of birth (we both came from working class families) …
Life ain’t fair nor is it equal … nor are people fair nor equal … one of the reasons socialism and communism could never work …
… there are builders and destroyers … at the moment I see the present government as destroyers not builders … and particularly cruel to the young, weak, old and vulnerable …
Oddly enough, while I had lunch, I just watched a re-run of an episode of Robin Hood on TV … nothing changes … cast Abbott as John I and Hockey as the Sherrif, pollies as the lords, PS as knights, the rest of us as the serfs or freemen … Robin Hood, the Earl of Huntingdon … mmmm … not Bill but I reckon Clivey might do … and about to be deprived of his seat in the Senate if King John and his vassals have their way too I see …
Do I believe we have equality? Not a chance …
Do I strive for equality? Absolutely, every day for those without it …
Do I see people not taking opportunities or not willing to take a risk, or not willing to say, study or, put the hard yards to learn before chasing the dream … yes … and they can be helped but education always costs … in failed projects because people didn’t know … or in providing the opportunity to learn … and the person and nation gaining from that learning opportunity …
Education, training and development are what changes the world and makes better and more productive people and nations … depriving those opportunities, to young people in particular, is to starve the country of maybe our Einstein …
Extremely short-sighted by the government … certainly nothing to do with equality (quite the opposite) nor giving people from all walks of life in our society a fair go …
Nothing changes …
Neil, the lefty idea is to make the debt so large that it cannot possibly be repaid. Now it is not that large and governments will feel some pressure to repay it.
When it gets to the level of, say, the US debt then it cease to be a real amount. It is just “a very large number” which will never be repaid. In that case there seems to be no serious attempt to address it and no real pressure from the people to do so.
At that stage the government is at liberty to keep on spending since it doesn’t really matter what the the “very large number” is. In fact nobody notices until the government can’t even repay the interest. Like in Greece.
I don’t even think they care that there is massive unemployment as a result. That just gives them more victims to “care” about and the caterwauling leftists will blame the unemployment on the evils of capitalism. They are all “care” and no responsibility
‘Life ain’t fair nor is it equal … nor are people fair nor equal … one of the reasons socialism and communism could never work …’
And we might be witnessing the death of democratic socialism, but I’m still moderately comfortable with the idea that the communist Chinese will one day rule the world.
TB I may have given the LIbs some credit for trying to create more opportunity by weaning people off welfare but having watched the ICAC investigations unfold it is hard to see the whole organisation as anything other than rotten to the core. They need more principles and less slogans.
Even worse, I don’t see any real move to restructure the party to remove the racketeers and lobbyists from their positions of control.
Baird has organised an emergency meeting of premiers on Sunday.
“The Prime Minister and the federal Treasurer, they have a job to do to get the budget back onto a sustainable path for the future of this nation, and we absolutely support them in that initiative,” Mr Baird said, standing with Mr Abbott at Arncliffe in Sydney’s south.
“We’ll be coming together and we’ll be putting forward proposals to the Prime Minister and the federal Treasurer on working that out together, and I’ve been very heartened to receive a call from the Prime Minister to say exactly that.
“He wants to listen to our concerns, he wants to work together, and I’m very confident we’ll be able to do that.”
Oz
I was out for dinner last night with a group (18) of business types, the level of antipathy towards Abbott and the budget surprised me.
The tread of consensus was that it was driven by ideology rather than economics, Abbott needs to be careful on this basis. Business types aren’t interested in ideology, they’re only concerned only about business conditions.
Even worse, I don’t see any real move to restructure the party to remove the racketeers and lobbyists from their positions of control.
That goes for both major parties … as I’ve said I have no time for any of the major parties these days … and in fact I’d prefer to see the abolition of political parties altogether and just have independent people who would have to demonstrate to the electors that they are qualified and experienced enough to BE a politician …
… eg a proper competency assessment – ie knowledge and skills to represent the people and be capable of being involved in running the country …
… a sophisticated Survivor type program would be good!
And a government selected from all parliamentarians who would present ideas, policies and bills to the rest of parliament … remove the silly concept of Opposition …
Individual representing the people … not representatives of business in any way shape or form …
Worth a read/watch …
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/5/15/national-affairs/kgb-interview-chris-bowen
The tread (sic) of consensus was that it was driven by ideology rather than economics,
Mmmmm, interesting … and as I too have being saying, ToM …
David Cameron, did similar silly things when he first came to power … one of my cousins in the UK, who lives on the south coast, predicted blood on the streets three months before the London riots … (no, I’m not saying the same)
I’m struggling with many aspects of this bludget* but the one I still keep coming back to, is the concept of making people between 18 and 30 wait for welfare for six months then a continuing cycle of six months blocks … very Margaret Thatcher, very USA and very childish amateur psychology like the $7 co-payment … it is very disturbing that any government could even float that idea … look after your mates??? What’s happened to Australia?
BTW, smart people you had dinner with – who paid? 🙂
‘Business types aren’t interested in ideology, they’re only concerned only about business conditions.’
Exactly, I blame hate media for everything.
The only thing to be gained from Labor getting back into power is more debt and deficit and more inequality.But lefties seem to like debt and deficit. Not sure why.
Debt and deficit eventually leads to cutbacks and austerity as govts try to find ways of getting unsustainable debt under control.
Heard all that before …
But lefties seem to like debt and deficit. Not sure why.Debt and deficit eventually leads to cutbacks and austerity as govts try to find ways of getting unsustainable debt under control.
And that too …
Debt and deficit eventually leads to cutbacks and austerity as govts try to find ways of getting unsustainable debt under control.And that …
Hey, Jummy! Jes’ in … fea yoo …
In the case of the USA the prognosis is not good, thankfully we got a wake up call.
What is your point TB???
Fact is austerity is tried after Socialists have trashed the joint.
“Aye, that’s as far as I got too.”
LOL 🙂
‘at the moment I see the present government as destroyers not builders …’
Infrastructure PM?
‘…and particularly cruel to the young, weak, old and vulnerable …’
Featherbedding has come to an end, but the most vulnerable will be protected. Hockey gave us his word.
What is your point TB???
You dare to accuse me of not having a point with your broken record of continuous comments … this is not a gulag where you sit on a fkn microphone and try to brainwash the inmates with your ideology … you are no longer in Europe!
Fact is austerity is tried after Socialists have trashed the joint.
It is the 21st Century … there are no socialists nor communists in Australia … in FACT it is 2014 and your party the Tories are actually in power – you won … this time … no shots fired … just an election …
… and THEIR budget has this country up in arms* because it is exactly what the Russians did to the satellite nations of the USSR … hit the poor …
I know why you hate socialists and communists … I have sympathised with Poland all my life and railed against the way the world treated the Poles particularly before and after WWII …
But you don’t seem to get … Australian politics … your are safe here … trust me I used to work for the government …
*(metaphorically speaking – I suspect you may have experienced literal “up in arms”)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Featherbedding has come to an end …
Please explain?
there are no socialists nor communists in Australia
Well not many and not enough to have any influence …
‘Please explain?’
My bad, featherbedding is the wrong word.
Cradle to grave handouts (the nanny state) has come to an end.
“and particularly cruel to the young, weak, old and vulnerable”
You know people said similar things about Howards Pacific Solution. Well the moral superiority people won the election in 2007, abolished Howards border laws and look at what happened.
We are now spending $1B/year more on the detention network than we did under Howard.
Scott Morrsion has just announced we can now start taking refugees from UNHCR camps, something that was almost stopped under the ALP.
What seemed cruel and nasty to lefties was a more fair system than what happened under ALP/Greens.
Selling our humanitarian places for $10,000 under Labor was an abomination.
Young aspirational voters in India finally get a voice. Its a popular win, but the Muslims are a little nervous.
There is plenty that is disgraceful in the budget, I find the following particularly disgraceful-
• Making people under 30 wait 6 months for the dole – disgraceful
• Increasing university fees – disgraceful
I’ll have to check on the health of the Democrats.
OK Tom you may be right.
But Wayne Swan ran up budgets deficits of -$27B, -$54B, -$47B, -$43B, -$18B and -$49B. That is a lot of debt in 6 years.
Do you believe like most lefties that debt does not matter and we can put everything on the Mastercard??
We are now paying $12B in interest on the debt racked up by the ALP. We actually had money in the bank in 2007. $12B would fund a large govt program.
…and isn’t the HIP royal commission interesting?
None of the former ALP luminaries are relying on the excuse their barrackers used when the debacle was occurring. No one has said-
• Pink batts are a fire retardant, so fires can’t happen, or
• It’s safer now than it was, or
• Blame the contractors/employers, they’re legally responsible, or
• Blame the state governments, they’re in charge of OHS laws and regulations, or
• Is the government responsible for a fatality on a road they built?
The politicians have said – “I accept ultimate responsibility, but
• I blame the public servants, and
• Blame Mark Arbib
Sunday’s gathering of premiers to discuss the budget, will concentrate on the NSW model, selling old assets to foreign buyers and build new infrastructure. Abbott and Baird now share the same vision.
“The anticipated infrastructure construction pipeline in NSW over the next five years is about $85 billion, of which a large portion is [public-private partnerships],” Mike Baird said. ”That opportunity, whether it be investment or construction work, has key infrastructure players very excited. The big pipeline both for NSW and across the country ensures that the global infrastructure players … are seeing Australia as an essential part of their business.”
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/nsw-seen-as-worlds-infrastructure-capital-thanks-to-85b-in-projects-says-mike-baird-20140202-31v07.html#ixzz31s6G8Grf
Neil, I think you need to start to differentiate between intelligent left people and those that aren’t.
The dull ones will just say bland things like –
• Our debt is manageable
• We have a AAA credit rating
• Swan was a great treasurer
You experience those types elsewhere – Catching Up etc.
Here, most of the left oriented contributors know debt is a problem if not addressed, and they are willing to suggest strong revenue measures rather than expenditure reductions. I don’t think the likes of AO, Ricky, TB, Dianne or reb just want to put more credit card.
But, the 2 issues that really irk me – the university fees and unemployment benefits – are more social engineering policies than economic ones (I think)
OK TOM. Once again you may be/are right.
We now have one of the fastest rates of growth of debt in the Western World. We have gone from zero debt to 10% debt in no time flat.
Unlike the European countries we have no manufacturing base. Our economy is services and mining/farming.
Falable human beings now in govt want to fix the hole in the roof before it starts to rain.
“Aye, that’s as far as I got too.”
LOL 🙂
Nowt lyke a “sick” joak t’ finish week out, lad! 🙂
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Cradle to grave handouts (the nanny state) has come to an end.
WTF! …
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
“and particularly cruel to the young, weak, old and vulnerable”
You know people said similar things about Howards Pacific Solution.
Mmmm … relevance? Zero … prattle, prattle …
We are now paying $12B in interest on the debt racked up by the ALP. We actually had money in the bank in 2007. $12B would fund a large govt program.
You are either an idiot or paranoid – either way you need to see a doctor, quickly …
===================================
Pink batts are a fire retardant, so fires can’t happen,
Er, fibreglass batts are fire retardant … the deaths were caused by foil batts … or electrical faults …
Actually the primary cause was greed/poor supervision … the sad part is that poor young men died trying to make a living … in one of the world’s richest country …
The insulation scheme was set up with the right intentions … it just proved the incompetence of so many people to operate in the real business world … especially Garrett …
I can imagine Abbott in a similar situation … “I don’t remember” …
But, the 2 issues that really irk me – the university fees and unemployment benefits – are more social engineering policies than economic ones (I think)
well said, sir!
Just sayin’ …
“You are either an idiot or paranoid – either way you need to see a doctor, quickly ”
We are now paying $12B/year on the debt your socialists mates racked up in power from 2008-2013. You obviously have no shame.
“Mmmm … relevance? Zero … prattle, prattle … ”
No, completely relevant. What may seem to be cruel to a socialist is actually a better policy.
Scott Morrison has just announced we are going to start taking more refugees from UNHCR camps. Something that was almost abolished under Rudd/Gillard.
‘WTF! …’
Please explain.
———-
‘…the university fees and unemployment benefits – are more social engineering policies than economic ones (I think)’
Fair comment, cutting off unemployment benefits to the under 30s in particular. This is a disaster waiting to happen.
TB – re: pink batts – the point is that the ALP politicians seem to understand “root cause”, the barrackers don’t.
If a government deliberately puts lots of money into a labour intensive industry with the specific aim of attracting new entrants and getting lots of very inexperienced workers into that industry – they have to hold a level of accountability for the tragic outcomes of their program.
Barrackers were just in denial about that.
So, in other words, “Duty of Care” of the employer and/or the relevant OHS (WHS) regime is just barrackers in denial……. some kind of ‘look over there’, …..mm, ….. interesting dat ………and yet??????
The employers were all reputable companies; not ‘fly by nighters’….. i.e. they shoulda known betta,….. and probably did.
If you want an even better account of what ‘went down’ one should look at the CSIRO’s report on HIP’s. *smiles*
That’s interesting, but you’ll have to try something a little more thorough
Rudd, Garrett and Arbib have all now accepted a level of responsibility for the HIP debacle. That’s appropriate given that they promoted a scheme that sought to rapidly expand and promote the entry of very inexperienced and lowly skilled people into an industry with low levels of regulation.
If a government-
• is in a hurry to lure thousands and thousands of people into a new industry
• throws money at the program
• tells contractors to hurry up because the program is for a limited time only
• does not adequately research the parallel the experience of other countries
…most people understand that poor safety practices are likely to follow, and that the government has to accept it’s share of the responsibility.
Rudd and Garrett now seem to understand this, but you don’t.
You know there are other ways of doing things.
We are so focused on binary opposites in this country. If you think neo-liberalism is crude then you must be a communist. If you express any misgivings about government support for anything or anybody then you must be an extreme right-winger.
As I mentioned to Egg yesterday, crank up the Google machine and check out the German economic model Mittelstand. I have long been fascinated by it and have intimate knowledge of its benefits.
Don’t you all yearn for something more creative and human scale than this free-market-slash–and-burn-efficiency-people-go-to-hell-pillage-the-environment-sweatshop-labour-using system we have? Of course it comes with an in-built detonating device as we are now seeing.
If Bill Shorten can articulate a new way forward I will listen.
Mittelstand survived the economic downturn of the past decade and the Chinese are so impressed that they are buying them up, lock stock and barrel.
‘If Bill Shorten can articulate a new way forward I will listen.’
His budget reply speech was full of hollow words and rhetoric, he was supposed to give us his version of how taxpayers money should be spent. Sorry Dianne, the man’s a loser.
Tanya is the only person capable of leading Labor out of the wilderness.
‘AUSTRALIA is addicted to public spending. Since the global financial crisis the government’s debt burden has nearly tripled whereas in Britain and Spain, which endured a full-blown economic disaster, it merely doubled.
‘Unless the Senate passes the Coalition’s budget it will continue to rise. Real public spending is set to grow 16 per cent from 2012 to 2018, says the IMF, faster than 17 other rich countries, including France, the US, Sweden, and New Zealand. Without action Australia faces never-ending public deficits, even with healthy increases in tax revenue of 6 per cent a year.’
Creighton / Oz
http://www.news.com.au/finance/money/loophole-makes-it-easy-to-avoid-budget-reform-pain/story-e6frfmci-1226920206798
No loop holes for the age pensioners or the unemployed under 30 (what, exactly, makes you different at 31 I wonder?)
“His budget reply speech was full of hollow words and rhetoric”
Unlike the Budget speech which was full of lies and broken promises…
It’s hard to pick a “winner” isn’t it, but at least Bill’s was honest.
TB – re: pink batts – the point is that the ALP politicians seem to understand “root cause”, the barrackers don’t.
Well I do for reasons explained in the past … but “multiple causation” is more appropriate in many ways than the simplistic “root cause analysis” many people are trained in …
And as I mentioned a few days ago responsibility and liability are two (legally) different things …
Legislation in all states and territories and federal jurisdictions are based upon duty of care as, lovo, rightly points out … and the contractor has that prime duty of care … based upon:
Safe workplace and access to it
Safe tools and equipment
Safe system of work
Proper training and supervision
In Queensland, for instance a householder could be held responsible for hiring an unregistered odd job man who has an assistant – the assistant is injured but the odd job man has no workers comp – the householder is legally bound by – and in breach of – both the WH&S ACT and WorkCover … unless he/she has a householders WC policy (used to be about $25pa) …
The only thing Rudd et al will suffer is damage to their personal reputation …
Yes Egg the Chinese recognize quality. Hope Mittelstand survives.
As for Your hollow words remark. .. Only time will tell if those were empty words.
Funny even great speeches are full of cliches and sentimentality upon close reading.
I think Shorten hit the mark because he expressed the nation’s rage, disappointment, confusion etc etc. take your pick.
It made a change from the maniacal clarity of rote learnt simplicity.
No place for nuance these days. Difference is seen as dissention.
Back to Mittelstand. It will survive. It grows from the community and is part of it. It has its roots in the German tradition of craftsmanship.
I have read the Chinese have been clever enough to recognize this important factor.
We shall see.
It is of course autobahnen ahead of our Nauru model of digging holes.
‘because he expressed the nation’s rage’
He told people on the left what they wanted to hear.
———-
‘It’s hard to pick a “winner” isn’t it, but at least Bill’s was honest.’
I’ll pay that.
And Tony Abrogate and Malcolm Turnbull aren’t saying much about the NBN lately either …
Maybe this is why … check your address here …
http://www.nbnco.com.au/when-do-i-get-it/rollout-map.html
And a special link for, splatterbum …
https://www.telstra.com.au/broadband/home-broadband/nbn/?tc=G|E|D|TP|TNBN|NBNTerms&mqp=sgI6ZMfem|dc_40999952307_nbn_e&gclid=CPiK9Kvtsb4CFUYHvAodAEsAiQ
The rates are at the bottom of the page … remember they include both broadband and telephone connections … our bill is generally about $110 for one mobile ($10 plan – yes! $10), landline and 50GB cable …
BUPA chief,
http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-funds-like-bupa-to-pay-doctors-to-keep-patients-out-of-hospital/story-fneuzlbd-1226920563682
‘the Chinese recognize quality. Hope Mittelstand survives.’
They recognise a good investment and the potential of transplanting the Mittelstand model on a universal scale. That’s why they are not interfering with the running of the organisations.
Mike Carlton nails it…
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/tony-abbotts-name-is-mud-20140515-zrd9w.html
You know what i hate. As usual the Australian Labor Party has trashed the budget. As the Australian Labor Party always does. Always without fail. Always. Always Always.
And the the Conservatives are elected to clean up the mess and the immoral scum who have created the mess then take the high moral ground and claim no responsibility for the mess.
Breaking news- we are now starting to take more refugees from UNHCR camps. These poor people were locked out because the immoral scum like TB, Reb, Toilet voted for Rudd in 2007.
TB, Reb, Toilet allowed our humanitarian program to be sold to the highest bidder because they voted for Rudd in 2007
Steady on sunshine ….
What for??
http://www.minister.immi.gov.au/media/sm/2014/sm214431.htm
‘In 2014-15 Australia will welcome 13 750 people through our humanitarian programme and remains one of the top three refugee resettlement countries in the world……..Of the 13 750 places at least 4000 will be provided under the SHP component for the families of offshore humanitarian entrants. Under Labor this program fell to just 500 places as those who came by boat took the place of people who applied through the legitimate process. Stopping the boats means we can return these places, delivering an additional 16 000 SHP places over the budget and forward estimates, in addition to the 4000 extra places already created this year.”
500??????? Can you believe it??
Because TB, Reb and Toilet voted for Rudd in 3007 we can only take 500 people from UNHCR camps.
Only 500 people from camps because TB voted for Rudd in 2007.
Fuck off lefties.
Neil – Since Abbott came to power how many asylum seekers on Manus Island have been “processed” and resettled?
Hint: it’s less than one.
“immoral scum”
Hmm.
Yep I stand by my comments.
After 6 years of taking people with $10,000 we are now starting to take people from UNHCR camps
“Under Labor this program fell to just 500 places as those who came by boat took the place of people who applied through the legitimate process.”
Can you believe it??
Under Rudd/Gilllard we were only taking 500 people from UNHCR camps because boat people were swamping the system.
because the immoral scum like TB, Reb, Toilet voted for Rudd in 2007.
I am really starting to get pissed off with your personal insults, Kneel … and I mean pissed off!
BBC – 15 May 2014
The trouble with conventional wisdom
“Get on the bus!” How many times have we heard that one from managers exhorting their team to buy into the project or strategy they are spearheading?
If you’re not on the bus, you’re not a team player, or even worse, you’re a negative influence. And we know what happens to people branded as “negative” in an organization, don’t we?
But what if this most common of conventional management wisdom is wrong — even dangerously wrong?…………….
http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20140514-forget-conventional-wisdom
Still at it I see, egg … nice try …
Good TB
http://www.architectureanddesign.com.au/news/murdered-manus-island-asylum-seeker-was-an-archite
“Asylum seeker Reza Berati, who was murdered at a detention centre on Manus Island on 17 February, was an architect……………….An Iranian national, the 23-year-old graduated as an architect. But unable to find work, he set out for Australia hoping to further his architectural studies. He had dreamed to settle in Melbourne.”
The only thing you voted for in 2007 was to destroy the lives of people in UNHCR camps.
Fuck off TB.
Fuck off TB.
LOL! I reckon I must have touched a nerve a couple of days ago … mmm …
Still your comments have always been good for a chuckle … ’tis amazing what folk give away without even trying …
What a shame. No logical comments.
Fact is you have destroyed the lives of thousands of people we would have taken from UNHCR camps had you not voted for Rudd in 2007.
And you do not care but most probably brag about your corrupt and immoral behaviour.
Fuck off once again.
Noticed Howes got married and not unsurprising he has a large circle of friends.
I’m disappointed at this government’s penny pinching on the arts, pathetic.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-17/cate-blanchett-slams-budget-cuts/5459416
“Because TB, Reb and Toilet voted for Rudd in 3007 we can only take 500 people from UNHCR camps.”
Honestly…FUCK YOU neil…YOU monochromatically thinking ARSECLOWN
How many fucking times do I have to point out the futile absurdity of that line of your commentary before it sinks in to your logically indifferent cranium?
I have no symbol on my keyboard for infinity.
Seriously though, you can leave me out of those dumbass comments unless you want heavy, personal return fire. Stupid cunt.
It’s as dense as me claiming that every act of potential youth crime, after the budget passes (presumably), can be slated home to Neil et al, for voting for AbbottCorp & his incredible lack of foresight in depleting the welfare system for unemployed under 30yo’s…
S T U P I D………C U N T
‘….his incredible lack of foresight in depleting the welfare system for unemployed under 30yo’s…’
Abbott displays ideological intent. Surely he doesn’t expect them to sit outside McDonalds or the post office with their begging bowls.
“Honestly…FUCK YOU neil…YOU monochromatically thinking ARSECLOWN”
Sorry Toilet.
John Howard got it wrong and you got it wrong.
can you believe it?? Under Rudd/Gillard we were only taking 500 people from UNHCR camps.
The rest were boat people with $10,000.
Under Howard we took 13,750 people from UNHCR camps.
I meant John Howard got it RIGHT and you got it wrong.
Indefensible partisan crap from you, Neil.
I refuse to be tarred with the misappropriated broad brush you are painting me with, by association.
What about the myriad of things Howard was wrong about?
Life isn’t an all or nothing proposition, you imbecile.
“Abbott displays ideological intent”
Yes, yes he does. It’s likely to be his undoing.
“Sorry Toilet”
I strongly doubt that.
To qualify…I don’t like welfare bludgers any more than any other person who feels like employment is a requisite societal obligation.
But attacking that with a blunt, ideological approach is counterproductive, fraught with unintended consequences & doomed to create monsters.
‘…fraught with unintended consequences & doomed to create monsters.’
That was my impression too, a modern form of larrikinism could erupt, gangs of young men roaming the streets vandalising civil society, all the while surviving on the sustenance they receive from soup kitchens.
He hasn’t thought this through.
“That was my impression too, a modern form of larrikinism could erupt, gangs of young men roaming the streets vandalising civil society, all the while surviving on the sustenance they receive from soup kitchens.”
Yeah! And they’ll be wearing Doc Martens, groin protectors, and bowler hats.
Ah yes, they were the good old days, these days its all hoodies.
I might need to change me undies if I don’t stop fretting about the inevitable Rise Of The Terrifying Abbott Dole Gangs! *shudder* 😯
WHEN DOLE-MONSTERS ATTACK!
*squirt*
It might happen, you don’t know, history might repeat itself. Here is a little history from Britanica, see if it sounds familiar.
larrikin, Australian slang term of unknown origin popularized in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It signifies a young hoodlum or hooligan in the impoverished subculture of urban Australia.
The term was applied to the large numbers of sporadically employed teenagers and young adults who banded together in gangs, or “pushes,” glorified the outlaw bushrangers, engaged in gang fights with each other, assaulted citizens (especially in Sydney and Melbourne), and generally defied and ridiculed the authorities.
Larrikinism declined after 1900 particularly in the face of intensified police surveillance; the stabilization of Australia’s urban society and the development of organized sporting activities have also been credited with contributing to its demise. The term larrikin is still used in Australia to characterize youthful rowdyism.
The
unintended dystopian consequences of the evil Abbott’s so-called “budget”.Be afraid, sheeple!
His attack on the arts is deplorable.
Artists of substance have usually found a way to exchange their work for food.
Others, who didn’t rely on taxpayers to sponsor them, attracted a wealthy patron instead.
”””To qualify…I don’t like welfare bludgers”””
dunny, l think people using the term/s ””welfare bludgers”” OR ””bludgers”” are a bit out of touch, like those that fret about `p0ofters` and `womens-lib`. The term has been relegated to history by those of us experiencing the current un/employment nastiness, and is used by those NOT in distress, or experienced employment distress.
Do you really think those that are stuck on the junk-job treadmill, would NOT work full-time, if it was available. Hint_they_would.
The main/root-cause of crap jobs requiring `wefare-backup` is Govt driven (teabag-specifically) with `dumping` and allowing more and more `value-adding` to be done off-shore, instead of Aust.
Take a look at TAS, turn the forest into `chips`, and ship it out. Mining, dig it up, and ship it out. Farming, often, is just harvest and ship it out. No value add being done, thus, sweet fcuk-all job-wise.
While at the same time, skilled, and high-skilled(qantas) jobs are being junked.
‘… attracted a wealthy patron instead.’
The free enterprise model might work, people are starved for entertainment. My thinking is that small groups will form organically into small businesses with the intention of getting into the market.
Its pretty clear Abbott’s thinking is toward multinational film and television deals to keep the industry afloat, not taxpayers money.
‘Farming, often, is just harvest and ship it out. No value add being done’
In the case of wheat, wool, sugar, beef etc. that’s the way its always been done, but the fruit and vegetable processing market is about to take off. In fact anything grown and processed in Australia gets a big tick from the burgeoning Chinese middle class.
Overseas and local investment money is developing new infrastructure, which will reduce the need for humans on site.
“Overseas and local investment money is developing new infrastructure, which will reduce the need for humans on site.”
Humans are “filth”, according to some, so we’re probably better off without them. [Does that “some” include themselves? – Ed.]
Humans are dispensable, this is the price of progress. All that’s required is half a dozen technicians and a modest number of people in the office.
Drudgery is being replaced by improved mechanisation … rejoice!
“Humans are dispensable”
Philosophically, I place the individual (myself) at the centre of the universe. Next are (all) other human beings, according to how important to me.
(This would go against everything a “leftist” stands for. They
believeclaimthat everyone else (the “state”) is more important than themselves.”””In the case of wheat, wool, sugar, beef etc. that’s the way its always been done,”””
#while largely true dumpty,
Govt could have done more to push innovation,
eg profits on `raw` exports could pay a higher corporate tax-rate/less-loopholes, than final consumer, finished goods
.
””’but the fruit and vegetable processing market is about to take off.””’
#don`t be so sure dumpty, on the job front anyway, the first port of call(by_employers) for these `seasonal` workers is the local backpackers, that get paid `about_$3-$4` an hour for `picking`, and it`s `off-the-books` in many cases,(no-tax)
this has driven many rural workers to the cities and big-towns.
(similar, backpackers/visas for factory/production/packing)
.
”””’In fact anything grown and processed in Australia gets a big tick from the burgeoning Chinese middle class.”””#agree
”Do you really think those that are stuck on the junk-job treadmill, would NOT work full-time, if it was available. Hint_they_would.”
Got a ling to prove that?
The rate between doing nothing on the dole an working 38 hours a week is about $8 an hour.
On an intelligent political blog, it is reasonable to expect a little more creativity or evidence than just presuming that everyone on the dole would prefer to work.
‘don`t be so sure dumpty’
Well then let’s replace those backpackers with larrikins from the cities, at least they won’t starve and the fresh air will do them good.
yes-sir-ee, those 10,000 workers slated to lose their qantas-jobs are just rubbing their hands in glee to be `sacked` and receive a mere fraction of their previous `wage` as welfare #teabags
#Tinfoil.Cubicle.Wisdom
“yes-sir-ee…
Great evidence and logic, a rational point well made, as always.
those of us who didn`t have daddy push us arse-backwards into an over-paid `cubicle`job, have had to fend for ourselves, during which we built up a lifetime of experience,
to which there may not be a `ling` to provide simple-trolls `evidence`,
maybe simple-trolls should start providing a `ling` to prove their position, instead of demanding a `ling` from everybody else #teabags
(I still reckon the workplace needs more flexibility, even with the welfare-to-work and work-to-woefare provisions; could we maybe rejig some post-modern awards and do something about the unfair unfair dismissal imposts on business?)
‘maybe simple-trolls should start providing …’
The onus is on you to provide a link and (if I’ve told you once I’ve told you a thousand times) there are no trolls at Trash.
meta, workplace `flexibility` will require acceptance of both child-slavery `and` sweat-shop conditions for australian corporations so that they can compete on a `level` playing-field with bangladesh
‘…unfair dismissal imposts on business?’
That will most likely come about in Abbott’s second term, with unemployment sitting at 3%.
””””The onus is on you to provide a link””””
try reading the comment first dumpty,
(from above)
during which we built up a ””lifetime of experience,””
to which there ””may not be a `ling` ””to provide simple-trolls
_____________
”””there are no trolls at Trash”””
believe what you wish(to your own peril)dumpty
yomm is providing kneel with serious challenge in the `simple-troll` division,
while you, dumpty, are being challenged in the `right-wing-troll` division,
my money`s on yomm, he can take you both 🙂
‘Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s threats to call an early election in the wake of the Budget are believed to be “serious”, according to senior government sources — if Mr Palmer turns the Senate into a circus.’
Maiden / Courier Mail
I might need to change me undies if I don’t stop fretting about the inevitable Rise Of The Terrifying Abbott Dole Gangs! *shudder*
Yeah, ToSY, couldn’t happen here … could it …
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_United_Kingdom_anti-austerity_protests
And we are far more sophisticated than Lond, UK … this sort of crap just couldn’t happen here either …
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_England_riots
The complacency of comfortable, well off people, throughout history, is one life’s strange little mysteries ….
The French aristocrats, Napoleon, Boston Tea Party, Hitler, Pearl Harbor,Singapore, Kokoda … just to mention some of the larger examples … of stupidity and complacency …
Take a look at TAS, turn the forest into `chips`, and ship it out. Mining, dig it up, and ship it out. Farming, often, is just harvest and ship it out. No value add being done, thus, sweet fcuk-all job-wise.
You forgot the banks, simply harvesting people’s hard earned $$$ … for doing nothing at all really … no farming, no mining just taking …
‘Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s threats to call an early election in the wake of the Budget are believed to be “serious”, according to senior government sources — if Mr Palmer turns the Senate into a circus.’
Oh, how we wished …
Go Clivey!
It would be a big help if the Socialists do not trash the budget every time they get into power. Then if/when the Coalition gets back in they will not have to appear to be so mean and nasty.
Why can’t you socialist deadbeats leave a surplus budget just for once??
… do something about the unfair unfair dismissal imposts on business?
Meta … but what does “do something” mean … allow incompetent managers and owners to hire and fire at will …
… as in at least one case I recall from my youth, when asked why one of the best workers I had was fired on the spot for questioning a stupid decision by the manager … “because I just don’t fkn like ‘im” … “just do your fkn job or your next” …
I love films like Gladiator …
Now why did I know this bloke would be a Republican? 🙄
http://www.news.com.au/world/breaking-news/utah-considers-firing-squad-executions/story-e6frfkui-1226921533416
I suspect Meta was talking tongue in cheek, in line with the atmosphere at the time.
‘Why can’t you socialist deadbeats leave a surplus budget just for once??’
I cannot speak for my comrades, but there is convincing evidence to suggest the Third Way requires massive funding. Pink revolutions aren’t cheap.
‘Then if/when the Coalition gets back in they will not have to appear to be so mean and nasty.’
That’s true, first and foremost they are economic rationalists and its their job to clean up after the leftoids have trashed the place.
‘Economic rationalists tend to favour deregulation, a free market economy, privatisation of state-owned industries, lower direct taxation and higher indirect taxation, and a reduction of the size of the welfare state.
‘… the term was also used to describe advocates of market-oriented reform within the Australian Labor Party, whose position was closer to what has become known as the ‘Third Way’.
Wiki
It would be interesting to see whether teabagz would, one day, try a rational discussion, instead of continually replying with overused and unoriginal Americanisms.
It would be interesting to see whether teabagz would, one day, try a rational discussion, instead of continually replying with overused and unoriginal Americanisms.
Not the only one I’m afraid … there is a definite move to the USA way of thinking from a quite a few on this blog … just as the mighty USofA’s empire begins to wane and crumble …
Like this quote from above …
I was referring to those who won’t work, teabagz. Not those who are unable to or have frustratingly limited employment.
They are definitely out there, in every town & city, playing the system; leeching the tax prided away from all of those who do work.
There are other words to describe it, but ‘bludging’ isn’t inappropriate.
I am not in favour of ‘junk jobs’ any more than you are.
My initial comment was directed towards those who are able minded & bodied & perfectly capable…but actively seek a free ride, not employment of any kind, and everyday is their weekend.
I thought my comments made it pretty clear that I’m definitely not in favour of treating every person who requires welfare as a ‘bludger’.
* prised away…
“there is a definite move to the USA way of thinking from a quite a few on this blog”
USA is not so bad. Better than most.
But it would really help, TB, if you and YOUR socialist mates in the ALP don’t trash the budget EVERY time they are elected.
This is Wayne Swan in action. Deficits of
-$27B, -$54B, -$47B, -$43B, -$18B and -$49B.
Unlike you and your socialist mates i do not think money grows on trees. I think we should live within our means and not put everything on the Mastercard
‘They are definitely out there, in every town & city, playing the system; leeching the tax prided away from all of those who do work.’
Abbott may round up all the able bodied men under 30, who are not gainfully employed, to enlist in his Green Army. The money is not too good, but its either that or agricultural work which backpackers now attend to.
In preference to those options the unemployed youth may settle for a shit job in the city on minimum wage or get reeducated.
The sticking point will be the indigenous population, not sure what is happening, but you can imagine the uproar if there was a hint that they might be treated differently to the bulk.
Neil – Howard encouraged us all to be ASPIRATIONAL. Don’t you recall. What does that mean? It means whipping out the credit card. It means borrowing to buy the McMansion and the second car to put in the double garage with the remote control door. It means fulfilling your dream for the FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT ROOM with the huge PLASMA in the corner, always warm, never off, burbling away with all those consumption related ‘reality shows’. Oh God. The boredom!
Spending more than you have has been the motor of our empty-headed society. Consumer sentiment. It is up! Yay. All is well. Spend spend. Great. Shoppers are on the loose again. Here is another tax break so you can keep unzipping that wallet. Fuel levy? Off it comes. Off to the shops. Baby bonus. First home owner’s grant. Lovely. More dosh. Let’s spend it.
The day of reckoning has been coming for thirty years. How you reckon is the question now.
“the unemployed youth may settle for a shit job in the city on minimum wage or get reeducated.”
Orwell would be proud.
“Until they became conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious.”
― George Orwell, 1984
Abbott may round up all the able bodied men under 30 …
Adolf Abbott … would be too …
“Spending more than you have has been the motor of our empty-headed society”
Absolutely.
And that is the belief of TB, REb, Toilet and all the other socialist deadbeats who post on this blog.
Its like living in a 1930’s novella … paranoid wankers thinking that everyone except themselves is a leeching commo … and praising concentration camps to intern foreigners to help the cause … and building autobahns across the nation …
Working parties in the fields to celebrate the master race … next it will be organised bonking to build the super humans …
Anyone unfit, old or infirm will slowly (or quickly – if possible!) disappear …
All must work in the name of the fatherland until we die!
Arbeit macht frei!
“socialist deadbeats”
“immoral scum”
Are you off the anti-depressants Neil?
You know, most medical advice is that you shouldn’t stop taking them suddenly. It can fuck with your head.
‘next it will be organised bonking to build the super humans …’
Mass orgies for the good of the nation.
It can fuck with your head.
Too late, sreb … much too late … I feel sorry for the poor, misguided twat …
Its those Russian drugs …
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Mass orgies for the good of the nation.
WTF do you think football is, egg …?
”””I was referring to those who won’t work, teabagz.”””
Yep, agree and understand that dunny. l was just pointing out that the `career-doley` is pretty much the `fringe` or minority of the problem of `welfare-payments`, and absolutely agree that they do exist. The Govt/teabags/talking-heads putting the focus on them tho, is to distract from the fact that if they hadn`t aided biz to trash full-time jobs in the first place, the `welfare` numbers would be drastically smaller.
Privatise the debt & socialise the losses…it’s just how they roll.
All of ToSY’s fauxsquirtatious comments, circa 17/5/14, presumably meant to be a backhand to my retorts towards Ideological Metronome of Sydney, are so puerile as to defy cogent response. 😉
“Spending more than you have has been the motor of our empty-headed society. ”
Great comment Dianne.
“And that is the belief of TB, REb, Toilet and all the other socialist deadbeats who post on this blog.”
Absolutely baseless load of shit from you again, Neil. I defy you to justify that smear in relation to any of my comments…let alone the other individuals you’ve chosen to slander. I hate plastic money. I certainly do not live off of, or by, it.
As Dianne pointed out, your hero went a long way towards fermenting the mindset you are falsely accusing me of.
I’m not socialist in the sense you infer. You read too much sop from sources which encourage monodimensional analysis. More fool you.
Also, if you keep on referencing me directly in your dumbasdogshit claims, I’ll become progressively less tolerant & polite towards you.
Errr, privatise the profits even…
‘WTF do you think football is, egg …?’
** chuckle **
He’s on the same delusional drugs as, Kneel … either that or they’ve been affected by a zombie virus …
And if very senior members of the Liberal Party didn’t expect “the sweeping budget cuts” … why should anyone else!
The next polls will be interesting …
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I was “discussing” the budget last night with a 30+ who was almost made redundant just a few months ago (he earns in excess of $200K) he couldn’t stop telling me about the cradle to the grave welfare mentality and how he was sick of supporting dole bludgers …
I remember the same whinging about workers comp in the 80’s (and probably now) when I was a Safety Officer (500 employees 24/7 op – reinforcing steel industry) …
All those bludging on WC …
Qld WC conducted an investigation into WC cheats – they reached the conclusion that 8% were “using” the system to some extent …
So we did our own “research” on our own WC recipients – my boss was an ex-cop from Victoria so among other things we literally followed up those who we suspected with a camera! One guy who lived a kilometre away we photographed building his extension – anyway the upshot of our investigation – surprisingly for both of us was similar to the QWC at about 5-6% …
We decided that we would prefer to concentrate on helping the 95% who needed assistance rather than the 5% …
Pity Abbott and Hockey et al don’t understand that “blanket” changes they want to make will affect the majority of people undeserving of their cruel approach …
The problem this country has, is that no-one pays enough income tax …
Also, if you keep on referencing me directly in your dumbasdogshit claims, I’ll become progressively less tolerant & polite towards you.
I thought along those lines last night, Toillette … then thought no, that’s just what a Tory would do to a sick and infirm person …
I then actually felt a little sorry for him and his ignis fatuus … and simply chose to ignore it … I found him later talking to himself …
‘l was just pointing out that the `career-doley` is pretty much the `fringe` or minority of the problem of `welfare-payments`
Not wishing to labour the point, there are 200,000 cannabis dependent individuals who can’t hold down a job and lets not forget the alcoholics.
This is not a fringe element, its a huge subculture.
This is not a fringe element, its a huge subculture.
So that’s not a problem for the Abbott government then …
… they just simply shoved the problem onto all genuine job seekers, age pensioners, young students and sick people …
… yeah that seems fair and ALL Australians are now bearing the burden …
… I know who fkn the bludgers are … and who isn’t bearing the burden nor doing their jobs …
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-07-01/off-the-hustings-james-glenday-politicians-pay/4790894
An amateur budget by childish, amateur politicians …
”””Consumer sentiment. It is up! Yay.”””
Agree Dianne. What they don`t tell you tho, is how this distorts and skews the big-picture outlook, with many needing credit-cards to meet their essential expenses, food, transport, electric, etc. So once you add in the `credit-costs`, the poorer are paying even more for these essential things, which makes even higher profits to the corporate sector. Notice how many `branded` credit-cards there are, offered by the retailers.
””””’there are 200,000 cannabis dependent individuals who can’t hold down a job and lets not forget the alcoholics.””””’
dumpty, these sound like, to use a military saying,
medically discharged, and,
unfit for duty #teabags
l remember, not so long ago dumpty, Mr-Eleventy was claiming 1/3 of aussies were receiving `some-type` of welfare payment.
(7 to 8 million.?)
ls that correct.?
What was the break-down.?
(sick/handicapped, elderly/retired, job-seeking etc)
“We decided that we would prefer to concentrate on helping the 95% who needed assistance rather than the 5% …
Pity Abbott and Hockey et al don’t understand that “blanket” changes they want to make will affect the majority of people undeserving of their cruel approach …”
Took the words out of my mouth, TB.
I may have left this open to interpretation, so I’ll attempt to remedy that…I hate how there is a stigma attached to genuine WorkCover cases, largely due to the rorting few. It means that the genuinely injured get treated as suspects, rather than victims or ‘recoverees in transit’. I think the unemployed are seen in much the same skewed fashion…&, to its shame, I think that the AbbottCorp Budget feeds off of that precise sentiment in the wider community.
I am prescient enough to tell the difference. The Neils of the world are not. Sometimes I think the Neils outnumber the rest of us.
“I thought along those lines last night, Toillette ”
I can recognise some of the legitimate anti-Labor points Neil has made over the years. Trouble is, he is so blinded by it all that he appears incapable of detecting the nuance of others’ opinions.
I honestly can’t see a multitude (if any) ALP supporters here; this ain’t Café Lobotomy. Yet he insists on recurrently (particularly in recent times) inserting my label into his categorical statements linking voting a certain way to human tragedy…as if people only vote a certain way on single issues & then are culpable for every resultant horror.
This ffucks me off tremendously, to say the least. primarily because it is fundamentally, demonstrably untrue & ignorant at its core.
”””I hate how there is a stigma attached to genuine WorkCover cases, largely due to the rorting few. It means that the genuinely injured get treated as suspects, rather than victims or ‘recoverees in transit’. I think the unemployed are seen in much the same skewed fashion”””’
”’the AbbottCorp Budget feeds off of that precise sentiment””#and promotes it
Fully agree dunny, well said
This ffucks me off tremendously, to say the least. primarily because it is fundamentally, demonstrably untrue & ignorant at its core.
And while we really disagree with this government’s budget, sreb, you and me have particularly and freely criticised both Rudd and Gillard and Rudd again … and Shorten now …
Some people don’t get it and it is pointless addressing the constant barrage of BS … like you tho’ I object to the personalising … not everyone that visits here has the benefit of history – as proven by some of, eggs recent comments …
Gonna watch The Boat That Guy Built now … and then G Gently!
Nice to see that you and I are still pretty much in sync!
””I honestly can’t see a multitude (if any) ALP supporters here””
coz there isn`t. From what is posted, there is teabags,
and non-teabags that seem to dislike both `teams` on a near equal basis, and don`t hold either `team` up a a model of excellence, but hold up both teams as models of crapulence,
just enjoy the fact dunny, the paid to comment mob are wasting their cash trolling this place 🙂
And so it begins … now, who was it said it couldn’t happen…
http://www.news.com.au/national/tens-of-thousands-turn-out-for-march-in-may-to-protest-against-abbott-governments-budget/story-fncynjr2-1226921811957
‘…he is so blinded by it all that he appears incapable of detecting the nuance of others’ opinions.’
He’s biased to an extreme degree after spending too much time at the kaf.
#march.in.may
ha ha TB 🙂 it does begin,
(l can`t see the teabag premiers going down the crapper for mr-rabbits benefit either)
Take your Meds
Just Fuck off
Annabelle in fine form… Behold real Journalism.
http://m.smh.com.au/comment/conservative-columnists-taxed-by-political-climate-change-20140516-zreyq.html.
hey teabags
Parlimentary salaries (base salary $195,130)
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2013-07-01/off-the-hustings-james-glenday-politicians-pay/4790894
#ie Federal Starting Pay
+Week $3752.50 (195,130 / 52)
+Month $16,260.83 (195,130 / 12)
Do you really think any of these fcukers are in touch with reality and understand the financial consequences of the crap they push on the rest of us.
”””””””’on budget morning, when the Prime Minister reported for his Jonesian rub-down, he received nothing but approval for pricier fuel.
http://m.smh.com.au/comment/conservative-columnists-taxed-by-political-climate-change-20140516-zreyq.html
””””””””””””””
ha ha ricky, 🙂 🙂 🙂 what mr-rabbit and mr-eleventy have `actually` done is, show the megaphones up, as the imbeciles dressed-up as journalists they actually are
Here is a statement by Gillard advisor, Stephen Koukoulas
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2013/s3751658.htm
“The problem with the Australian level of gross debt now and this is the Basel three requirements for looking after banks in the post GFC world is we don’t have enough debt.”
Don’t have enough debt??? Koukoulas is insane and it explains why the budget is always trashed under the ALP. Rudd/Gillard/Swan et al do not believe debt is a problem.
‘VOTERS have declared the government’s first budget to be the worst in more than 20 years, with support for the Coalition dropping to the lowest level since the dying days of Malcolm Turnbull’s leadership.’
Hudson / Oz
I demand a fresh election.
Squeals you economically imbecilic fiberal stooge…
JUST FUCK OFF
The Kouks questions to HOKEY ahead of Q&A
http://thekouk.com/blog/my-ten-questions-for-mr-hockey-ahead-of-q-a.html#.U3lCWeSSwwo
I forgot to mention. Stephen Koukoulas is more than insane. Anybody who says we do not have enough debt is off the planet.
But Koukoulas is the most deceitful writer i have ever read.
And off course he votes for the ALP as you would expect and was an adviser to Gillard.
“insane” would be an economic illiterate with a brain the size of a garden pea refuting the writing of a senior economist with nothing more than simpleton stupidity
FUCK OFF SQUEALS
SQUEAL FIBERAL LIES
CHRONIC MASTURBATING PARROT
ECONOMIC SQUEALLY KNOBBERY
http://thekouk.com/blog/take-away-there-budget-snake-oil-and-what-are-you-left-with.html#.U3lLPuSSwwo
The head of one of Australia’s biggest banks has slammed the quality of debate about debt in this country, labelling it ”very immature”.
National Australia Bank chief executive Cameron Clyne said we had a ”unique window” as a AAA-rated country to issue more government debt to fund desperately needed infrastructure.
”Australia has a debt problem: we don’t have enough,” Mr Clyne said on Thursday.
”If we continue to have the debate that suggests that all debt is bad, and not a debate on the productive use of debt, we will simply not be able to fund the infrastructure this economy needs to thrive into the future.”
Mr Clyne’s comments came a day after the Business Council of Australia released a 10-year action plan for a stronger economy, calling on major political parties to focus on long-term rather than short-term policies.
It listed 10 things it would like the government to do, including developing a national infrastructure plan to ensure the right infrastructure was delivered at the right time.
”Dedicated annual funding and a clear policy on the use of debt for infrastructure will ensure that Australia’s stock of infrastructure grows in line with our economic development and population growth,” the report said.
http://www.smh.com.au/business/we-have-a-debt-problem-says-nab-chief-20130801-2r29e.html#ixzz327F06w3p
Clyne makes sense.
InfrastructureInfrastructureInfrastructure
‘Bank of America Merrill Lynch chief economist Saul Eslake said he had sympathy with that view.
”One of the more sensible ways of seeking to reduce the risk of recession when the mining investment boom starts to wind down in a couple of years’ time would be for the government to do precisely that,” he said.
”We could borrow up to 3 to 4 percentage points of GDP without imperilling our AAA rating, as long as it was for rigorously evaluated and well-targeted infrastructure spending.”
Yep
“We could borrow up to 3 to 4 percentage points of GDP without imperilling our AAA rating, ”
I bet you since that article was published we are close to borrowing more than the 3 to 4 percentage points that would endanger our AAA rating.
Furthermore a large chunk of this increase in debt is just to fund govt problems like pensions, military etc.
Military acquisitions are over a long time span and not relevant, while welfare can easily be trimmed to give the correct impression to overseas investors.
Clyne, Eastlake and Abbott are talking the same language, we grow the country with mass immigration and huge infrastructure spending in the outback.
“Military acquisitions are over a long time span and not relevant”
But…what about when it’s our money (every cent of it is) and it’s being used to buy lemons, which other countries are running away from as fast as they can, even when that much becomes patently obvious from the mouths of the lemon merchants themselves?
Is it somehow less relevant than the squealing about ‘inefficient’ NBN’s…or sundry other ‘inefficient’ programmes undertaken by the former government (who also seem to be balls deep in the JSF….timid as all of our leaders are to spurn Unca Sam’s Military Industrial succubi?
Makes me think that the objections to domestic ‘inefficiency’ were predominantly ideological in nature…hmmmm, Yom?
Railing against the inefficient spending of our ‘involuntary contributions’ (as taxpayers) is admirable…only doing so as a partisan shriek is something else entirely.
I feel your angst and agree the plane is a mess, but its bipartisan and built into the forward estimates. We cannot shirk out of our alliance responsibilities, buying lemons from US snake oil salesmen is our lot until the Chinese take over.
”””’our lot until the Chinese take over.”””’
unfortunately, it often seems like that
mr-eleventy is on qandaland waffling lots of bullshit about
`not breaking election promises` while getting grilled and mostly `boo`ed by the in-house viewers #teabags
l heard on the telly/news earlier,
bill `where the fcuk is he hiding` shortman has sky-rocketed ahead of mr-rabbit in the Limited-new noise-polls,
it seems shortman managed to let mr-rabbit plummet to numbers worse than Joolya`s, all under his own steam,
#already
#that didn`t take long _ #teabags 🙂 #Go Clive
http://www.smh.com.au/business/we-have-a-debt-problem-says-nab-chief-20130801-2r29e.html