Skip to content
Advertisements

Win for animal activists and media but ag-gag fight goes on

September 24, 2014

_5448665_orig

The following article is by Elise Burgess, head of communications at animal protection institute Voiceless. 

The animal protection movement has recorded a significant victory, with the defeat of “ag-gag” legislation in South Australia.

On Tuesday, South Australian legislators voted against the Surveillance Devices Bill, which sought to criminalise the public release of information collected through the use of surveillance devices, with a maximum penalty of $75,000 for a corporation and $15,000 or imprisonment for three years for individuals.

This bill would have had a significant impact on how the media reports on matters of public interest, including the treatment of animals in factory farms.

Its reintroduction in the Legislative Council by Labor Agriculture, Food and Fisheries Minister Gail Gago on June 5 this year attracted fierce opposition from media outlets, workers’ unions and animal protection groups, which use such footage to expose cruelty within Australia’s animal industries.

Thankfully, on this occasion, cooler heads have prevailed with The Greens, Dignity for Disability, the Xenophon Group and the Liberal Party all voting the bill down. This is a win for consumer advocacy, workers’ rights, freedom of the press and, of course, animal protection.

Opposition to the bill was celebrated by Greens MLC Tammy Franks, who said that “the upper house ensured it won’t just be those with the deepest pockets who will be able to broadcast footage that is in the public interest. Those who expose corruption or cruelty will be supported, not thwarted, in our state”.

Yet, while it is heartening to see South Australian legislators respond to an immense public outcry and to vote against ag-gag, the debate is far from over.

NSW Minister for Primary Industries Katrina Hodgkinson and Victorian Agriculture Minister Peter Walsh have called for legislation to target animal activists in their respective states, a move supported by Federal Agriculture Minister, Barnaby Joyce.

Western Australian Liberal Senator Chris Back, a former vet and long-time advocate for tough laws targeting animal activists, has also announced plans to put forward ag-gag laws at a federal level.

Given the secrecy within which animal industries operate, these moves represent a co-ordinated attack on the public’s right to question the status quo and to ask questions about how millions of sentient creatures are treated in Australia every day.

In July this year, PETA USA revealed a shocking video filmed within Australian shearing sheds, giving the public an unprecedented view of the wool industry.

What they saw was horrific abuse: sheep being violently body slammed, repeatedly punched in the face, beaten and their bloody wounds sewn roughly with needle and thread and without pain relief.

The images depicted large-scale brutality.

Even though the footage was collected across 19 locations, the industry claimed the pictures are not representative of its work.

Either way, the images show that cruelty is occurring and that the industry is failing to regulate itself.

Greater transparency in animal production is needed, as increased public awareness has the potential to bring about real change and industry improvement.

Under ag-gag, it would be illegal for activists to document animal cruelty and illegal for the media to report on it.

In practice, these laws could lead to journalists or advocates being jailed for doing their jobs, and consumers being left in the dark.

Shutting down the free flow of information, stifling debate and protecting industry from public scrutiny is not the way forward.

Instead, open dialogue and transparency is needed.

That is the future of this debate, not closed doors.

Advertisements
4 Comments leave one →
  1. September 24, 2014 11:17 pm

    good to see sa come to their senses,

    nsw egg producers have just been busted for `defrauding` the public, they sold `cheaper` cage-eggs as free-range eggs which retail `about` $2.00-to-$2.50 more,

    it is really a bad teabag idea that `collecting evidence` of a crime is `worse` than the actual crime, reminds me of the snowden and assange situations #teabags

  2. September 24, 2014 11:44 pm

    on the beaten sheep,

    over the years l`ve met a few shearing crews and they told me the same as other livestock workers have, keep quite and calm and don`t `over-handle` the animal, it keeps the animal calmer and easier to work with, l haven`t seen any follow-up on the story, but my bet is those shearers are 457s or never trained properly,

    by the way, shearers l spoke to told me the farmers refused to pay when their sheep where damaged/injured by shearers, so it was not in the shearers interest to `abuse` the animal, tho that was pre-corporate farms

  3. September 25, 2014 7:18 am

    “it is really a bad teabag idea that `collecting evidence` of a crime is `worse` than the actual crime”

    AGREED!

  4. Tom of Melbourne permalink
    October 6, 2014 1:47 pm

    A woman has won a coveted City of Melbourne arts grant to document and present an epic tattoo on her back as art.

    So, we’re spending ratepayer’s cash on publicising someone’s tattoo!!

    That’s money well spent, let’s just hope it encourages more people to get tattoo’s as a memento…or just “art”

    Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/tattoo-project-wins-council-arts-grant-20141005-10qi31.html#ixzz3FKSRxEC0

    (posted here because the really long threads cause my phone to go slow)

Go on say something, you'll feel better...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: